• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    The USSR was a one-party state, and the state did own and control everything. However, this is fundamentally entirely different from Nazi Germany, which was a combination of corporations and a party owning and controlling everything in a totalitarian Capitalist manner.

    It’s reductive to call the USSR fascist, in my opinion. The USSR wasn’t a shining beacon of tolerance and democracy, of course, but at the same time it absolutely was not fascist. The Russian Federation, that rose from the ruins of the USSR, is fascist, and run by extremely wealthy Capitalists.

    As for equality in the USSR, gender economic equality was generally high overall, especially when compared to other nations, and especially in the military, but not within government. As for racism, it was apparently much, much better than modern Russia, so make of that what you will, but the state was seemingly mostly composed of white men. Homosexuality was made illegal by Stalin, I do know that.

    • rocket_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      You made some good points, I concede I was being overly reductive. I think you made a great summary of it.

      I edited my previous comment to reflect how you changed my mind.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Thanks, no problem! I think it’s totally fine to be firmly against the USSR, for clarification, but I also believe that fascism should be as clearly defined and understood as possible, because in the modern era it poses a genuine threat, so understanding what it looks like and how it operates is key.