• Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    There’s always one!

    I hate to break to to you, but public health policy does not and should not consider the opinion of lunatics. I legitimately cannot believe this isn’t obvious.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      The anti-vaxxers are lunatics, yes. But they always were and it doesn’t really matter what they think.

      But you think anyone who felt a slight concern about a brand new vaccine was a “lunatic”? These people needed reassurance, not “Do as you’re fucking told, idiot”. The fact people can’t see this baffles me.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Problem is those people didn’t want to listen to doctors who had the nuanced view of “there might be issues with a vaccine which development we’ve had to accelerate, but the alternative of not taking it is demonstrably worse for everyone”, they only wanted to listen to the people who shared their position.

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          My healthcare professionals: “it is mRNA, it creates the spike protein and then is gone from your system in a matter of hours. Those proteins trigger an immune response that works as an inoculation.”

          Vs.

          Guys on the internet: “the mRNA is experimental gene therapy that will alter your DNA and make your ovaries or testes grow spikes like a chestnut. It crosses the blood/brain barrier and gives you Creutzfeldt–Jakob.”

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Someone trying to justify allowing soft policy on vaccinations.

        • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t think it’s controversial to be against forced medication.

          At least it never used to be.

          • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            See this is exactly why people are calling you out. We’ve seen this exact same bullshit so many times where it’s just like “oh we are being reasonable and just asking questions and doing due diligence” but they you always end up with the loaded language of “forced vaccinations” and “product testing.”

            Yes, in the middle of a pandemic, where people were dropping dead and entire medical systems were on the verge of collapse, timelines might have been advanced a bit. Your incredibly privileged language manages to leave that part out somehow, and replaced these very justifiable motivations with unfounded malevolence. It’s frankly insulting to those traumatized by not only the pandemic, but these selfish and toxic attitudes.

            And the worst part? You were proven wrong. Again. None of your concerns were validated. The vaccines were a miracle which brought us out of an extremely dark time. There was no corporate malevolence, no serious side effects, just good science and better outcomes. But still, for some reason, you will cling to your utterly selfish positions and bullshit concern trolling, and that’s why everyone is pissed off at you. Because you’ve clearly learned nothing, and will obviously force all of this same nonsense on us the next time there is a tragedy.

            • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              The person you are talking to isn’t an anti-vaxxer though. They are pointing out that vaccine mandates are questionable at best in terms of ethics. The campaign to push vaccines was also fraught with issues that helped create more antivaxxers.

              • Soggy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Questionable ethics? Not for collectivists. My personal freedoms do not trump the well-being of the rest of society, and it’s perfectly reasonable to have rules about health and hygiene to protect the whole.

              • bitchkat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                We have had vaccine mandates for decades in order to do things like have kids attend school.

              • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I’m sure familiar with this type of concern troll. They are in the first stage of their descent. Possibly the second stage, based on the loaded language they are using.

                I have personally lost several family members to this exact “reasoning” so I know precisely what it looks like a few months later.

                • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Concern troll? Are you calling me or them a concern troll? I don’t think pointing out how badly run campaigns and regressive legislation lead to reduced vaccine uptake is concern trolling. Concern trolling would be pretending they were concerned for your mental or physical health as a way to make your opinion seem invalid.

            • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              My concerns? What were my concerns?

              I’m talking about trying to prevent diseases coming back due to increased vaccine scepticism that started with governmental COVID responses. I wasn’t sceptical of the vaccines and nowhere did I say I was.

              no serious side effects

              Not widespread, but none at all is patently untrue. There will always be serious side effects in rare cases in any medication.