• 00x0xx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Considering the behavior of British tourist globally today, or even the history of their empire, the two words may as well have the same meaning.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can only apologise for my fellow countrymen. They’re pricks, especially a group of lads or the typical Gammon family unit, and it’s why I try to holiday in places with as few of them as possible.

        • 00x0xx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Accusing the British of being Brutes is like accusing Germans of being Nazi’s. It is rooted in the historic actions of these nations, rather than anything in particular they’ve done today. Sure British tourist have their stereotypes, but honestly they aren’t worse than Chinese tourist, or Muslim migrants. As long as British tourist are still paying customers, many nations will still be happy to host them. Don’t take these comments so seriously, it’s all in good humor.

          Brexit on the other hand is a tragedy so awful that you can wonder how a nation once known for it’s ability to govern an empire spanning the entire globe, and innovators of capitalism, made such a stupid decision. Like pointing a gun to your head and pulling the trigger thinking it will cure your headache. It’s so ridiculous I still can’t come up with a proper insult to throw at the Brits concerning their decision to commit economic suicide.

    • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah i’ve learned not to trust this kind of simmetrical worldview, even when it makes me feel smart for being above it.

      • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What if instead of taking it as saying all things are symmetrical we take it to mean that we have a tendency to consider outsiders to be “savage” or simply “other” even when the evidence doesn’t support that? Then this shitpost would be more like a warning against xenophobia.

        You chose an interpretation you didn’t like just so you could dismiss it. And you don’t think your goal in doing so is to feel intellectually superior? You’re another.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          What if instead of aggressively going off on people we consider that they may have valid experiences shaping their worldview, and that their point is not even necessarily opposed to ours anyway?

          • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I think we have the same point here - and there’s no aggression. That’s more of your cyber brain fleshing out details of a person one cannot know but only touches through a singular on-screen opinion. You attributed aggression because it went with the context. See how quickly this shit happens? And people are actually dismissing the meme… it’s happening right in front of us

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s addressing the concept of demonization, a la Israel and Palestine. It’s via these mechanisms that other people are dehumanized.

          Not Karen v Karen at the pta meeting.

            • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Ah yes, the runaway Reddit train of: “Anyone who sees anything in the world as more than plain good vs evil is evil”

              Like most subreddits, what started as an interesting idea (calling out people who supported fascism by saying anti-fascism was as bad as it) devolved into an absolutely moronic circlejerk (anyone who says anything is the same as anything else is a bot).

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Miss.

              Again it’s about any group demonizing another.

              The process of generating the “subhuman” other based on misinformation.

              It’s not about holding people to their honest record.

              Playing the middle and saying “both sides” is completely different than what this image is displaying.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Miss.

                Again it is about exactly what I said. “Our glorious leader” is not about other people it is both sideism.

                It’s about playing both sideism.

                What side are you on in Russia-Ukraine? No question dodging “enlightened centralist”.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  If your whole view is just shit reposted on Lemmy about American politics sure.

                  You’re just exposing your field of vision.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Because it isn’t always true? Sometimes you government just has regular levels of suck while the other government is really awful. I am confident that the South Korean government has room for improvement I am not willing to put them on the same level as North Korea. Plus you can look at migration flows. There is a reason why some countries have people willing to risk death to get into and other countries people are trying to get out of.

    • Abucketofpuppies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hmmm it’s almost as if politics and ethics are very nuanced and one answer is never correct in every situation…

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        One side thinks the answer is “do fascism”, so I think it may be fair to conclude that one of the proposed answers is at least wrong in every situation.

        • Abucketofpuppies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, every right-wing politician is pushing for ‘do fascism’

          Probably like they did your mom last night. BOOM GOTCHA

      • niktemadur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        One faction has a messiah fixation, thumps a Bible they’ve never even read (they just let some pastor tell them what’s in it), obsesses over guns and other peoples’ private (by which I mean sexual) lives and reproductive organs. They’ve been told and so believe that Sodom and Gomorrah was about the sex, but it was about righteousness and hospitality - and these are two things that they themselves lack completely.

        There is a real problem, a real danger, because it fits historical patterns we’ve seen before - the so-called “ideas” that they spout with the language that they use - and they end up mindlessly, senselessly bringing EVERYBODY down with them.

        They are a menace to all of us. Including themselves, but they don’t see it. And neither does the “both sides” argument, a lazy excuse for not acknowledging that the proverbial emperor has no clothes.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m not sure if this “faction” you speak of is really as clear cut as you think it is. Nor whether it’s being depicted in the comic. You’re specifically reading your “faction” belief into this comic in order to criticize it.

          What would the other “faction” be? Would it not be people in the same country? Does the meme even apply at that point?

          This shit is clearly about xenophobia and all of you responding with Reddit Buzzwords are completely missing that point. In fact, you’re contributing to xenophobia by refusing to recognize it. You might have more in common with the “bible thumpers” than you realized.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      no, you’re just so lost in years of political memes that you can’t understand a simple point anymore. this isn’t about fuckin Russia or fascism or the election. it’s about demonizing and polarizing our equals. and you’ve clearly eaten that fuckin bait in one bite, you’re experiencing so much cognitive disonancia that you can’t even see beyond your own petty politics and just worry that OMG SOMEONE ISNT CALLING THE THING I DONT LIKE A BAD THING ITS BAD BAD BAD CMON thats this entire fucking thread and the entire political landscape around here, no I’m not okay and none of you are. I’m so fucking sick of internet politics and everyone’s fucking unnuanced cliches and worthless calls to arms

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Good God it’s like I can hear how white you are!

        That’s a pretty easy opinion to have when that “difference of opinions” isn’t over your right to live and be considered a full human with full and equitable human rights.

        This sounds more like you’re lashing out because someone NCed you after getting tired of your peacekeeper complex moving you to try and shut them up whenever they were getting into it with the weird uncle at Thanksgiving because “you’re the reasonable one come on please just take the high road here!”

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          when that “difference of opinions” isn’t over your right to live

          WHERE in this meme does it specify any of that? The point of this meme is that both scenarios are EXACTLY the same.

          YOU CHOOSE to say “Well what about when they aren’t the same! I bet you call them the same then too!”

          Or these absolute lunatics who are calling me a… Putin supporter? Where the fuck is that coming from?

          You all need a SERIOUS DETOX from this political shit. This is no longer about awareness or collective action or “bearing witness to the end” or whatever justifications you make to spend your hours posting this nonsense. This is about detachment from actual human connections where we experience real differences of opinion and find ways to mediate those differences

          As for whatever that fantasy is at the end of your comnment, you’re even farther from the truth than the morons calling me a Putin supporter. but that’s an appropriate example of the kind of DELUSIONS that online politics are forcing you into. someone says ONE FUCKING THING and you suddenly WRITE AN ENTIRE STORY for them to conform to who you believe would hold that one opinion. stop treating people like fucking abstract ideas and shut the fuck up and LISTEN for once. stop dismissing everything and calling everything counteraction!

          at the end of the day all I’m talking about is learning to understand others, and we’re getting lost in these discourses. stop just dismissing everything for once and fucking listen

            • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I guess we’re at the point where any nuance is lost and you’re just gonna throw the third set of buzzwords out. But oh well, hey, “it’s just c/shitpost” right! Or maybe if that’s the case, political matters deserve more nuance than a shitposting community can deliver, and by showing half-assed engagement in political discourse this way we become part of the problem.

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Man you are just the fattest piece of troll bait I’ve ever seen, it takes literally nothing to set you off bro.

        • duffman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s still odd seeing people proudly being racist. It will be great when you all go slithering back to your holes.

  • Fat Tony@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I feel like the artist originally wanted to make this primarily medieval themed. But then realisied “Oh yeah, news and stuff are a thing.” And then just added laptops and antennas.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          9 months ago

          Shh don’t try to get them to understand, they need their safety blanket of good vs evil because without feeling like they’re one of the good guys they’ll have to confront their own personal failings.

            • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’ve said plenty “to your face” and all you see me as is another anonymous with a preset of opinions you’re already set on disagreeing with. You don’t give me the benefit of even having a face. But you expect it from others? Next time you see me , ask something about me and get to know me.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Looks cowardly when you dont say it directly to someone. No surprise an englightened centralist would use that method.

                Takes the slightest bit of courage to study an issue and stand by a value judgement. Takes no courage to claim to be above it.

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      I bet there are, just a matter of scale and effectiveness.

      There’s an organization that sneaks usb drives to North Korea. Full of news, shows, articles etc all hand picked by former NK citizens that defected

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        But is it disinformation?

        Spreading information is not the same as spreading lies.

          • Clent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            You seriously believe this? This isn’t a great documentary, it peddles conspiracies theories without attempting to prove any of its claims.

            The channel this is posted on is clearly of one opinion and is pushing an agenda.

            They are brought to a detention center, for a week, longer if they are showing signs of cult behavior. The video tries really hard to show this to be horrible and makes zero attempts to balance this in anyway. To me this sounds like a deprogramming center but to a tankie it is primed to accept its sinister and therefore will accept it without thinking.

            This video actually proves that not everyone can be deprogrammed. Near the end the one of the North Korean’s literally says North Korea is awesome and not a dictatorship because it says so in the constitution. Also, the lack of protesters during the famine are proof that every one believed in the leadership so much that there was no need to protest.

            That’s cult mentality. There are people who believe everything they hear and lack critical thinking skills. You might be one of them, but I am not.

            To a critical observer this only serves to show how subversive propaganda is and how it can permanently break some people’s minds.

            The fact that that exists, shows we have freedoms. Show me the anti-north Korean propaganda that North Koreans can freely access.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              This isn’t a great documentary, it peddles conspiracies theories without attempting to prove any of its claims.

              Direct Testimonial of trafficked North Korean ex-pats is the proof.

              This video actually proves that not everyone can be deprogrammed

              This comment certainly is.

        • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’m sure it’s not all 100% objective truth. Nobody wants to talk shit about themselves willingly. But yeah just sayin.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I mean, a whole heck of a lot of the US is perfectly willing to talk shit about the US. We just get annoyed if people outside the US that aren’t Nordic start talking shit about the US. The Swiss can shut up, or put up. Same for India.

            That being said, you’re probably correct that it isn’t objective, as I seriously doubt that they are sending solely documentaries and AP sources.

            Edit: Congratulations to The Swiss for their stance on Ukraine.

          • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re so brain rotted you can’t conceive that someone would throw their own country under the bus. Most people in developed societies do, frequently.

            • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Nobody as in world leaders. Not nobody as in individual citizens.

              People in the US know things are fucked up, but when was the last time you heard that said in a State of the Union address for example? When it’s on a world stage every country tries to look good.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      “Hmm here’s a situation I arbitrarily picked out where this message doesn’t apply, therefore the message is useless to all situations. And anyone who says otherwise is supporting the bad guys of my arbitrary situation” - literally all of you

  • brown567@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think about this whenever I see legislative efforts to “prevent disinformation” XD

    I hate disinformation as much as the next guy, but we gotta be careful who we give charte blanche to censor information XD

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s worth pointing out that the two opposing countries / nations / city states in this cartoon would have to have similar governments with similar charters, and similar selection processes for their representatives.

    It is lunacy to say things like “Obummer was a dictator!” when he was selected twice by people voting, and then peaceably left the office after his two terms completely in line with the Constitution.

    Now can you say the same thing about, for instance, Putin?

    • considine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s important to follow the laws of the land, otherwise there is damage to the system. Legal framework, electoral framework, political framework. So when answering your question about Putin, the electoral rules and legalities of Russia’s system must be examined. Were they violated?

      That is also a question on the US national agenda for Trump. It is important to consider his case in context of the system. And to compare his real estate dealings to others who deal in real estate. What was the severity and nature of the alleged crime? Are these kinds of behaviors common in the American political class?

  • x4740N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    What I get from this image is that one side will call the other side evil while the other side will do the same

    It’s best to look at the actions of a person or group rather than what they state they are doing

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    There is a reason the Geneva Convention (and the Hague protocols before it) prohibit assassination. That reason is that the Glorious Leader and the Wicked Despot have more in common with each other than they do with us peons. Don’t anyone get too excited during our “war” (population reduction, economic stimulus package, domestic troubles distraction). Invest in defense contractors, the elite will keep them fed.

    Remember the average dude in China, Iran, Russia, etc is no more interested in dying to aggrandize his rich owners than you are.

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Remember the average dude in China, Iran, Russia, etc is no more interested in dying to aggrandize his rich owners than you are.

      True, and you also have to remember that many of them have it ingrained in their culture to hate enough to kill gays, other religious people, races, etc.

      Despite how much people love to say one culture isn’t better than any other… There absolutely are if you’re looking through a lens of equality. Particularly if you’ve grown up in a more westernized nation where non-perfect progress has been made on those points.

      Let’s just hope the west doesn’t continue turning into Yallqaeda and all the lost Fascists suddenly earn a Herman Cain award.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Rule of the world. The most violent ape gets to continue his lineage. To continue to pretend that we’re more than violent apes is naive.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Come on, you know that creatures who evolved the capacity for linguistic communication adapted to external forces with more than just greater and greater violence. We’re not whispering cobras. We’re creatures that demand community. The reason we even feel emotions like shame and love is to bond us together as a tribe for greater protection.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The reason we even feel emotions like shame and love is to bond us together as a tribe for greater protection violence.

        FTFY.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Damn, social structure only does violence? At this point I’m convinced you’re just moralizing your own traumas. Are we heading for anti-natalism?

          • thantik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Nah, anti-natalism would be anti-progress. Evolution is a process that should continue to happen. Even Evolution is violence. Violence is necessary for life. It’s a core part of what allowed us to exist in the first place. It’s one of the fundamental forces of life. The problem is seeing violence as inherently bad. Or humans as inherently special.

            Once you start viewing humanity the same way you’d view organisms in a Petri Dish, you’ll have gotten it. Higher order functionality is neat and all, but fundamentally not shattering to our basic goals. It doesn’t overwrite our core reason for being: To spread.

            When talking about something like Game Theory, one of the most effective strategies follows only a few basic rules:

            1. Cooperate with others.
            2. If wronged, strike back.
            3. Don’t hold a grudge.

            So - as you can see - even the most effective, cooperative strategies, employ violence.

            • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I see! Well, isn’t it also true that even the most effective violent strategies also employ cooperation? Why only highlight the violence - is it to serve a need or narrative?

              • thantik@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Maybe…because that’s the focus of the original post…

                The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The most violent ape probably got murdered once he pissed off enough other apes. But the ape that used violence strategically is probably the ancestor of today’s leaders.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s an incredible point. Intelligence allowed violence to be used more strategically.