Three visual artists are suing artificial intelligence image-generators to protect their copyrights and careers.

Visual artists fight back against AI companies for repurposing their work::Three visual artists are suing artificial intelligence image-generators to protect their copyrights and careers.

  • Grimy@lemmy.worldEnglish
    71·
    1 year ago

    “The Stable Diffusion model makes four gigabytes of observations regarding more than five billion images. That means that its model contains less than one byte of information per image analyzed (a byte is just eight bits—a zero or a one).”

    What a great article, it really lays it out well and concisely. I like the above point especially.

    • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      5·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, there’s gold wherever you look. I like:

      First, copyright law doesn’t prevent you from making factual observations about a work or copying the facts embodied in a work (this is called the “idea/expression distinction”). Rather, copyright forbids you from copying the work’s creative expression in a way that could substitute for the original, and from making “derivative works” when those works copy too much creative expression from the original.