• hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thanks. This relies heavily on how well carbon capture technology works out. From what I’ve been reading, it’s pretty inefficient and expensive, at least currently. Whether it can scale is an open question. Additionally, burning this fuel will release whatever carbon was captured. This may help to slow down emissions, but better battery tech looks like it’ll go much further.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Batteries and their construction if at the moment a worse alternative. And involves slave labour.

        At least C02 is already naturally occurring. Btw, humans and plants need C02 to live. Without it we die …

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Batteries and their construction come out ahead over the life of the vehicle. There is nothing about battery manufacturing that requires slave labour. You could make the slave labour claim about anything being manufactured. As for your CO2 points, those are repeats of oil industry propaganda. Based on your point, why even bother trying to capture carbon when CO2 is so great, right? It’s a matter of amount. We need water to live, but drinking too much water will kill you.