issue0315@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoControversial benchmarking website goes behind paywall — Userbenchmark now requires a $10 monthly subscriptionwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1462arrow-down112
arrow-up1450arrow-down1external-linkControversial benchmarking website goes behind paywall — Userbenchmark now requires a $10 monthly subscriptionwww.tomshardware.comissue0315@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up44·1 year agoRight so clearly userbenchmark is trash, but where could one, hypothetically, go, to, hypothetically, compare the performance of various cpus, hypothetically?
minus-squareiliketurtles@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoI like nanoreview https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare
minus-squareferret@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoThe phoronix testing site can be alright, if a little haphazard and spotty
Right so clearly userbenchmark is trash, but where could one, hypothetically, go, to, hypothetically, compare the performance of various cpus, hypothetically?
openbenchmarking.org
I like nanoreview https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare
The phoronix testing site can be alright, if a little haphazard and spotty