• Im_old@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not familiar with gg and dG commands, and when I try them on a text file in vi it says they are not valid command. What should they do? (maybe they are specific to vim, but I only have vi, it came with the os and it’s good enough for me).

            Also, :x is WAAAAYYY faster (lol) than :wq 😛

              • Im_old@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why? I’m not my mum. Looks like you are not even good at explaining the jokes. Not a surprise, she was not impressed either.

                • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  What!? Are you serious? She texted me later and said “Don’t bother coming over again” and I honestly took it as having satisfied her so thoroughly that all she needed was one time with me!?

                  Also in vim “gg” navigates to the beginning of a document (remember it as the opposite of “good game”, you are at the beginning). “dG” deletes to G the end of the document, G being the opposite command to gg in that it brings you to the end of a document.

                  :wq of course means write and quit

  • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    RimWorld, I have hundreds of hours of playtime, (not including my previous extralegal copy) and now I am obsessed with:

    • human nuggets (not that kind) (not immediately, anyways)
    • organ harvesting
    • human leather cowboy hats (and dusters)
    • greenhouses (for weed* and cocaine)
    • how do I fit the new turrets in my existing killbox

    *not actually true, it’s all coke

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elite: Dangerous has lots of players that complain all day and play all night. Probably EVE too

    • Irishred88@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I found Elite: Dangerous incredibly cool. How many chances will we get to explore some version of our solar system? I know the game feels empty, but I found it relaxing for the same reason truck simulator is relaxing, just cruising and enjoying the scenery

  • CandyPants@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Escape from Tarkov… Fucking hate that game!! I’ll be on tonight 7pm central if anyone wants to team up.

    • Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is the time really lost if you got a ballin new mount and ledendary weapons and have perfected your spe- yeah i should go touch grass :/

  • Epicmulch@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Starfield. People played for 700 hours then wrote a bad review then play for another 300 hours . Bro if you put 1000 hours into a game there was obviously something you liked about it.

    • beefcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a great example. Starfield (like other BGS games) does a lot of things well that few other games do at all. So it’s frustrating when they put out a game that is pretty mediocre outside those few strengths, and also your only real option for scratching those particular itches.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure many of those people exist. Most of the bad reviews I would imagine came from people that put 1-10 hours into it.

      • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Your comment got me curious, so I did some digging. Unfortunately Steam caps out filtering reviews at “above 100”, so I couldn’t find a way to get data on the difference between 100-200 hour players vs 500-1000 hour players for example. But I broke it down by 0-24 hours, 25-49 hours, 50-99 hours, and 100+ hours to see the results.

        Unsurprisingly, folks who played it for less than 25 hours liked it the least, with an average of 50% positive reviews. This is also the largest sample size by far, accounting for 51,686 of the roughly 140,000 reviews.

        More surprisingly however, the next three data sets (25-49, 50-99, and 100+), order themselves naturally from “most positive sentiment to least”. Essentially, the longer you play it after 25 hours, the more likely you are to rate it negatively.

        Breaking it down:

        0-24 hours: 50% positive reviews out of 51,686 players.

        25-49 hours: 69% positive reviews out of 34.644 players

        50-99 hours: 64% positive reviews out of 30,775 players

        100+ hours: 61% positive reviews out of 22,800 players.

        Oh, and because I just reread your comment, I checked out the 1-10 hour players as well, and your guess there was accurate. 40% positive reviews out of the 27,316 players in that range.

        And given that there were more negative reviews in the 0-24 hour range than reviews from people who even played it for more than 100 hours, I would say you were mostly right about the guess that players who played it for a very extensive time and reviewed it negatively were a minority. Even if that minority was made up of about 8,900 reviews, or roughly 6.3%.

        While this is far from a “definitive scientific test”, the data on Steam seems to indicate that among people who liked the game enough to put significant time into it, the more they played, the less likely they were to rate it positively.

  • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve put in over 2,700 hours into Oxygen Not Included, so that’s my vote.

    Edit: Oh dip, I just looked it up and I’m slightly over 2,800 now :/

    • SEND_NOODLES_PLS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I just wish the lemmy ONI community was a bit more active. I should be above 2K hours in now too, and I haven’t won yet. My current run I’m trying to get up to 20 dupes while also trying my first attempt at something magma power.

      • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Longest I’ve ever gotten was 1114 cycles, and I haven’t won yet either. You don’t win, you just do better each time…

      • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tell people it’s the funnest game you’ll ever hate. It’s cathartic as hell when everything is running smoothly, but it just takes one little bump to throw everything off.

        • Really_long_toes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I put 200+ hours in on my steam deck… originally I was looking g for a fallout shelter type game, but more depth, I had no idea what I was in for

    • sleepmode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every time I go to try it. “Tf do all these words mean?” I have no idea what is going on. I need to sit down with a guide or something. But got distracted by ESO and was able to dive in immediately so I guess it’ll be 20 years before I repeat the process.

      • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a steep learning curve as far as the basics go, but once you level up a frame, a couple decent weapons and some basic Mods (stat-up accessories), it might get you for good. I played if for years and it was pretty fun.

        One of the big stumbling blocks is that level up by itself doesn’t do anything but open up slots for Mods, it doesn’t increase your stats. You need good mods and to rank them up to actually get stronger.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want to like Rimworld so much, but without mods it’s unplayable, and with them the game stops being fun. Rimworld misses something, I I can’t put my finger on it.

      • Kylah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree to some degree but I do think the core game is solid but mods absolutely add a whole different (better) experience.