Volodymyr Zelenskiy declared his personal income for the first time since the outbreak of war with Russia, as part of his effort to increase transparency in his government.

In 2021, the year before Russia invaded Ukraine, Zelenskiy and his family reported income of 10.8 million hryvnia ($285,000), down 12 million hryvnia from the previous year, even as his income was boosted by the sale of $142,000 of government bonds, according to a statement on his website.

In 2022, the first year of the Russian invasion, the Zelenskiy family’s income fell further to 3.7 million hryvnia as he earned less income from renting real estate he owned because of the hostilities.

Even as the war allowed Ukrainian officials to withhold revealing sensitive personal information, Zelenskiy pushed to make them publicly declare assets. Increasing transparency and tackling graft are necessary for his country to ensure continued financial aid from its western allies, even as more than $100 billion of funds are held up due to political maneuvering inside US and EU.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    188
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gotta say, that’s an almost aggressively reasonable salary for running an entire country,

    I’d consider myself pretty well taken care of for that level of pay.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        100
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is what still blows me away.

        A fucking actor is doing a better job running a country specifically during wartime than a typical politician.

        It’s fuckin embarrassing to every single person on this planet who’s dealing with stupid/corrupt/inept politicians who would sell their constituents for fuckin toilet paper.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          63
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Calling him just an actor is sort of unfair to him though. He was basically Ukraine’s Jon Stewart. He does a great job as a politician because he spent years satirizing them, so he knows how the sausage is made and he knows how they totally fuck up and how to avoid it. That’s why he’s so successful at his job.

          And, I imagine, if Jon Stewart ever ran for office, he would do similarly well.

          • Plopp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            imagine, if Jon Stewart ever ran for office

            Please, I can only get so erect. I’d tune in 24/7. With popcorn.

        • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          11 months ago

          Tbf, the US tried the actor president twice, and they turned out to be the two worst presidents in modern US history, so it might not always be the best idea to elect the “outsider”.

        • Archer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I think the Ukrainian public decided to throw a curveball that Putin and the KGB could never predict - electing an absolute outsider who the KGB didn’t have time to corrupt

          • sudneo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Zelensky’s campaign was supported by a Ukrainian oligarch. Not exactly an “absolute outsider”. In fact, during the campaign the supporters of Poroshenko (who tend to be more nationalists) used this as ground to accuse him of being associated with Russia (among other things).

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              What people need to understand about the Ukrainian oligarchs are that they’re actually oligarchs. It’s not US-style “we should get around to regulating campaign financing some time so that Google doesn’t run candidates”, it’s not Russia-style “Actually you’re a minor noble there to exploit your dedicated region for the Tsar, by appointment of the Tsar”:

              In Ukraine it’s “businesspeople with not completely clean records running for office because that’s a neat way to get legal immunity and corruption opportunities”, aka actual oligarchy, with the fat cats themselves in office. They’re absolutely not a unified front, often hate each other’s guts both in a business and political sense, and while (at least for the longest time) the Ukrainian people had practically no say in who would run, they could choose which Oligarch they liked best, putting their thumb on the scales.

              So why did Kolomoyskyi support Zelensky? There’s a very simple explanation: Zelensky ran against Poroshenko, who Kolomoyskyi had quite a fallout over stuff much more important than politics, that being funnelling oil into to Kolomoyskyi’s refineries:

              On 25 March 2015, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko signed a decree dismissing Kolomoyskyi from the post of Dnipropetrovsk RSA Head, saying “Dnipropetrovsk region must remain a bastion of Ukraine in the East and protect peace”. Kolomoyskyi was replaced by Valentyn Reznichenko.[31][120][121] This followed a struggle with Poroshenko for control of the state-owned oil pipeline operator.[122] After Poroshenko’s dismissal of Oleksandr Lazorko, who was a protégé of Kolomoyskyi, as a chief executive of UkrTransNafta, Kolomoyskyi dispatched his private security guards to seize control of the company’s headquarters and expel the new government-appointed management. While Lazorko was in charge the state-owned pipelines had been delivering oil to a Kolomoyskyi-owned refinery in preference to competitors.[31][123]

              In a further move against Kolomoyskyi, Poroshenko replaced Kolomoisky’s long-time business partner Ihor Palytsa as governor of neighboring Odesa Oblast with the former Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili. That appointment triggered a dramatic and public war of words between Kolomoyskyi and Saakashvili. Saakashvili told journalists Kolomoyskyi was a “gangster” and “smuggler.” Kolomoyskyi told them Saakashvili was “a dog without a muzzle” and “a snotty-nosed addict.”[124]

              Kolomoyskyi responded that the only difference between Poroshenko and Yanukovych is “a good education, good English and lack of a criminal record.” Everything else is the same: “It’s the same blood, the same flesh reincarnated. If Yanukovych was a lumpen dictator, Poroshenko is the educated usurper, slave to his absolute power, craven to absolute power.”[125]

              Enemy of my enemy and all that.

              I can’t really tell just how important access to Kolomoyskyi’s TV channel was for Zelensky’s campaign, the man was a folk hero way before meaning that vanishing on TV might’ve just boosted his youtube channel in equal amount.

        • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I mean, don’t you member doctor house? An actor could earn more than a doctor by pretending to be a doctor. Why can’t an actor lead a country better than a politician?

        • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Politicians are actors of politics in a way. Reagan is the oft-cited example of a total himbo politician who acted a cultural identity people associated with.

    • echoplex21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      lol honestly my middle manager boss makes more than him while he’s running one of the most stressful jobs in the world.

    • june@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think we’re gonna learn some things about him after this war is over that we won’t like. He’s doing great as a war time president, but no one is this squeaky clean.

      • eek2121@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        11 months ago

        …and that is okay. He is still doing an incredible job and is an incredible public figure.

        Nobody is perfect, nor do they have to be.

        • june@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Absolutely. I couldn’t agree more.

          I just see a lot of people putting him on a pedestal that are probably gonna be let down some day.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        True.

        For example Churchill: great wartime PM, but also very much an anti-worker free market believing imperialist who actively fought against both independence for and immigration from the British colonies. People tend to only remember the first part, though.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          My dad, who was a socialist until the day he died, told me proudly about how he booed Churchill when Churchill came to visit his high school after the war, but when he was still PM. He was Jewish, so he appreciated Churchill’s war leadership that kept the Nazis from invading, but otherwise thought he was a shit leader.

        • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          And wasn’t he kinda known for being a drunk? (Still one of the most quotable people in recent history)

      • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Here’s his approval rating over time that reflects this point perfectly. He’s supported in his actions during the war way more than he was as a politician, he was actually doing pretty badly before the war in his approvals. Interested to see how the prolonged conflict affects this, and what the regional differences are.

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        But you could say the same thing about you, just you’re not in a spotlight. What’s the point of even saying ‘everyone has something’.

        • june@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, I am included in ‘everyone’.

          The reason I say it is because Zelensky has been put on a pretty high pedestal, for example:

          bruh everything about zelensky is incredible. What a guy

          And some folks are going to be sorely disappointed later on when they learn more about him and where his failings lie.

            • june@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Which would be meaningless for nearly anyone that’s not in a position of power and influence, yes.

              I’m really not sure what your point is here.

    • comrade19@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I hope they make statues of him like they did with all those bygone fellas that did something great

    • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve been disturbed to see an increasing number of purple parroting character assassination points about Zelenskiy.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    So who is getting rich of this war? Whatever is left of Ukraine after this is over is basically going to be owned by the EU and US.