• dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Faulty software and people who don’t operate it properly, this is going to cause a lot of problems in the coming years. I read another article about faulty Fujitsu auditing software in the UK that led to 400 postmasters being falsely accused of theft.

    • Cowlitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      That shit was wild. It went on for so long and impacted so many people. At that point I have to think people were intentionally ignoring it. It ruined so many lives just to say “haha sorry, was a software glitch” when they could have investigated it at any point and definitely should have with the strange uptick in “embezzlement”.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was investigated. They opened an internal investigation and when it became obvious the investigator was going to blow it open, they cancelled the investigation 2 days before the report was going to come out.

        Seriously, it’s really looking like the entire board over several years should face jail time.

  • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is this not a case of an unavailable accusers? In other words, Traffic Cams have time and again been overturned as unconstitutional because you have the right to face your accusers?

    Pretty sure Tom from IT can rustle up a laptop to take to court but…Facial Recog. is some bullshit 1984 bullshit.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Macy’s, Sunglass Hut, Rite-Aid… We need a website with a list of the companies that falsely accuse their visitors of crimes. The public needs to know the dangers of shopping at these places.

    Also, AI should be excluded as evidence of a crime. The results of any form of AI analysis should be forbidden in probable cause statements.

    • eran_morad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuck that, i want a list of all stores deploying facial recognition. I’ll take my money elsewhere, fuck you very much.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Agreed. If a store uses facial recognition, it can only be to falsely accuse their visitors of crimes. The only possible outcomes of facial recognition are unreliable results and false accusations.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t want to shop in stores that scan my face 🙊 time for some research.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are we all gonna have to start wearing disruptive clothing to avoid our lives being destroyed by an algo with immunity?

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    That dude deserves a payday at the very least. Facial recognition isn’t reliable yet. And even when it is that shit should still be illegal to use as the sole justification in arrests. Do some god damn police work. Especially if the dude has an air tight alibi like BEING IN JAIL. It would take 5 minutes to confirm that.