• notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And still, I’m more likely to stop using YouTube than to stop using an ad blocker.

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what they want. Get all the users they aren’t able to monetize off the platform to lower their costs.

      • danielbln@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, I like a good Google hate train as much as the next guy, but that’s kind of a legitimate thing to want.

        • eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s YouTube’s fault for setting the wrong expectations when they benefited from wild growth and success by being free all these years. I dare they go 100% paywalled. I know they won’t. Otherwise they can’t double dip on both premium and advertiser money. Even if they manage to go 100% paywall, it’s inevitable that they will start introducing adverts to paying customers as well.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They used the “You” as in the people, during their growth years to build their platform. Now they are going against the people since they no longer need us.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really wish government would just come in already and shatter google into a million pieces with the anti-monopoly hammer already.

    Google is far worse than AT&T ever was when it was shattered into the baby bells.

    Just gotta learn from AT&T to not let them re-congeal back together like somekind of fucked up liquid metal terminator 20+ years down the line.

    • debil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly! I started surfin’ da information highway in the 90’s. I remember watching an image unveil itself slowly as a morning sunrise.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Frankly, I’d stop using YouTube entirely before I’d start using it without an adblocker. At least there are no signs of it slowing down for me, yet.

  • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We’ll make our service worse, that’ll show them!”

    Ok google, good luck with that.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      At this point I’m convinced they’re trying to drive people away to shrink the overhead on bandwidth and servers, but it doesn’t work like that. Not after you got them hooked on videos of cats after years of a steady drip of memes.

    • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be really cool to be able to download YouTube videos withour the sponsorship segments, I wonder if there is a way to do his already?

      • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        yt-dlp has a command-line option to download videos while using sponsor block.

        yt-dlp https://youtube... --sponsorblock-remove all
        
      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like the ads surrounding the video and breaking the video up or the spots in the video where the creator hawks their latest wares?

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My worry with all this is that they might say fuck it and put DRM for all YouTube videos which would block attempts to download the videos. Not make it impossible as seen with streaming services but not as trivial as now…

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The day they go 100% paywalled, is the day their dominance ends. They will never do this because, contrary to the corporate dickriders in this thread they rely on bait and switch tactics to draw the crowd in the first place.

      • gila@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well the good news is Widevine is very expensive, and doesn’t work. It’s not as simple as right click / save target as, but Widevine decryption is why you can torrent any of the shows/movies on those streaming services.

        Everytime someone requests a video on those services, the service pays a fee to Widevine. $0.50 USD per request for the first 30k requests/month. How much you think Google is willing to pay someone for you to watch cat videos for free?

  • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish we can fast forward to the part where Youtube completely destroys itself and a new platform takes its place so we can enjoy it for 10 years before the enshittification cycle restarts again.

    • Kevnyon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is that only conglomerates can eat the cost of running such a platform. Ads will be the end of free interne, that’s for sure.

    • test113@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not so sure – YouTube is much larger than you might think. It’s not the video platform you grew up with anymore. No one in this world can match the backlog and content density/diversity of YouTube, not even all streaming services combined. People complaining that YouTube is dying because a few YouTubers “retire” from their main gig or that it’s not the same anymore don’t understand how YouTube works. They might not comprehend that the time of their “bubble” has come to an end. When this happens, there are already five new bubbles/niches that are even bigger, and you might not have heard of them, but they are more successful than their “predecessor.” The old bubble is still there to consume in the backlog. Someday in the future, AI will have a field day with the data accumulated via YouTube.

      It is transforming, for sure, but I don’t think it will destroy itself completely. In a sense, you can say it will destroy whatever view you had of YouTube as a platform because it is not what it once was.

      To my knowledge, YouTube will hit the billion-user milestone this year (Netflix currently at ~250 million paid users). If we look at other data trends from streaming services, it suggests that YouTube will grow more over the coming years. I don’t know how anyone can match YouTube as a whole. In certain niches, sure, but as a whole, it would be like fighting windmills. There’s a reason no one tries to tackle YouTube as a platform and only goes for certain niches.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m actually really surprised pornhub hasn’t moved into the YouTube like space. They have the infrastructure and expertise. Why not branch into that ? Especially if YouTube keeps pissing off users.

  • net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I dusted off an old laptop, put debian on it, put an SSD and now I have my own invidious instance, among other services…

    No ads, no throttling, no bullshit. Google is very welcome to suck it. I’d gladly stop using youtube, but there’s no competition.

    • sfgifz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Next step is guaranteed to be limiting the number of views without being logged in.

      • net00@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The more stuff they do to shoot themselves in the foot, the sooner something else comes in to replace youtube

    • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know it’s a pain, but what’s to stop us from using download-clis? In theory I could “collect” the urls that are recommended to me from my home page, call the clis, click all the videos to update my recommendations then close the browser.

      • cartoon meme dog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        using the browser isn’t necessary to keep your watch history up to date.

        yt-dlp can log in as you by reading your cookies from your browser, and, with the optional --mark-watched flag, mark your downloaded videos as watched in your YT account.

        • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          TIL. Thank you very much. Looks like I’m going to be using that if YouTube gets even more painful.

    • Amir @lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The no competition in the market, is the issue. Hope the situation improves in near future. With it innovations will gradually increase & the demand within the markets will point the directions.

    • 5redie8@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for reminding me to get myself an invidious instance set up. It isn’t a huge pain or anything, right?

      • net00@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really, they have a docker compose file ready to go, and it works without issue.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apparently this seems to be mainly affecting Chrome users, lol.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but what I find funny is that if people had already jumped from Chrome they probably wouldn’t be having problems.

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anything better than listening 3 songs and getting 5 ads.

    Stop being trash youtube. Be normal like you once were and i would actually consider a paid subscription IF i get to fully exclude shorts on my side of the platform.

    • WhipperSnapper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not at all a solution, but worth mentioning that in a YouTube URL you can replace /shorts/ with /v/ and get the normal player for the same video.

      • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just want the short form content out of my life, but your tip might help others who dislike the player and not the video’s.