• iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Mofo keeps adding shit that isn’t in the budget probably.

    At some point the people funding the project have to deliver a product, and if Kojima keeps the title in development hell there won’t be a product.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      You talking about the same kojima that delivered endless hits to the company over three decades?

      • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Endless? Pretty sure you can count them. They have numbers on the name.

        Quit fanboying for a second and realize there are real time and money constraints, you cannot endlessly shovel features into software at a whim.

        MGSV going open world was dangerous enough.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes let’s count them

          1. Metal Gear 1987
          2. Snatcher 1988
          3. SD Snatcher 1990
          4. Metal Gear 2 1990
          5. Policenauts 1994
          6. Metal Gear Solid 1998
          7. Metal Gear Solid 2 2001
          8. Zone of the Enders 2001
          9. Boktai: The Sun Is in Your Hand 2003
          10. Metal Gear Solid 3 2004
          11. Boktai 2: Solar Boy Django 2004
          12. Metal Gear Solid 4 2008
          13. Metal Gear Solid Peace Walker 2010
          14. Metal Gear Solid Ground Zeroes 2014
          15. Metal Gear Solid V: Phantom Pain

          At this point, Konami shutter kojima productions, throw away the fox engine they had made for all Konami developers to use and fired the goose that laid their only golden eggs. At no point does kojima go more than 4 years between new products for Konami.

          If you want to look at it from the purely business perspective, then you can make the argument that their new ceo wanted out of the video games business to focus on pachinko. That’s a valid thing to make claims around. They basically killed off all their video game products.

          But if you want to claim that that the game just needed to ship regardless, then well, reviews, critics, players, consumers, they’ll all disagree with you there. The number one complaint is that this game wasn’t finished. And as we’ve learnt Konami seemed to have bad blood that made them vindictive against the developers of the game that likely made things worse.

    • cloud9@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Then how do you explain this:

      “Keighley went on to detail how shocked he was when he found out that Konami didn’t allow Kojima to attend last year’s Game Awards.” (a quote from the article)

      • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        Idk I don’t work there. Imagine there’s a lot of bad blood from trying to rein in Kojima, which eventually pushed him into starting his own studio.