• InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    87
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People are so quick with conclusions without actual information.

    If you read the article, it is about whether the person gave consent or not for the kiss.

    We as just observers on the internet, have no idea about that. So why drawing conclusions?

    EDIT you can downvote all you want, since it doesn’t mean anything on here. However let me ask:

    Were you next to both of them when it happened? I’m assuming not, so how do you know the facts? Conclusions without facts are just random opinions.

    • Liv2themax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a significant difference between claiming some things was spontaneous and actually getting consent. This guy wasn’t in a relationship with the player where this type of behavior would have been previously cleared. He’s not even claiming that he asked permission. In this case you would have to assume mutual spontaneous consent. That is what he’s claiming. However, one party has clearly said it wasn’t mutual consent. So now you either have to assume the victim is lying or you take the logical path and realize that there’s photographic evidence of a powerful figure, who doesn’t claim to have asked for consent, assaulting a female athlete and showing no regard or remorse for that behavior.

      • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        48
        ·
        1 year ago

        First of all thanks for an actual argument without throwing insults and such.

        You are right indeed, about actual consent, spontaneousness/ spontaneous consent. One party says it was spontaneous consent and the other party said it was not, so how do we as the internet observer what it truly was?

        I mean, certainly if it was not, he should resign and such. I would like to say though, I never said that there was no photographic evidence. This matter is an she versus he said.

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude, Hermoso herself said it was non consensual. How can you justify suing HER since it happened to HER. Do you know what she was thinking?

      • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        42
        ·
        1 year ago

        My point is, people here pretend as if they know everything what has truly happened. While we are just observers, we do not know actually has been said at that right moment (or do we?). I do not justify anything, never claimed I was justifying anything.

        Certainly he can he an ‘‘POS’’ but I don’t know. I don’t know him that much, do not follow him and do not know him personally.

        • rusticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can see that he kissed her on the lips and she said she didn’t want or consent to that. What more evidence do you need? Do you think she is lying?

          • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            35
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, we can see he did that. Yes, she said that afterwards. She showed no signs of it at that moment.

            I’m not saying she’s lying, I’m saying that the people on here pretend to know everything.

            Personally, I’m curious how this goes. What more evidence I want? Nothing. Don’t think there’s more unless we can actually get a video with sound where we hear what both of them say.

            • rusticus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you don’t want any more evidence. So you either believe her or you think she’s a liar. Which is it?

                • rusticus@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No. You didn’t. You said “I’m not saying she’s lying”. That’s not the same.

                  Do you believe her statements or do you think she’s lying?

      • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well the fact that no one gave an counterargument, proves my point.

        This is pretty much “follow the hate train”. As usual.

        I don’t particular like the guy but people here pretend as if they have been there and heard everything. Which is kind of funny(?)

        • frickineh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          The counterargument is that she said it wasn’t consensual. Holy shit, how many people in your life should think about pressing charges against you if that’s how you think consent works?

          • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            31
            ·
            1 year ago

            Since you are making this personal, I won’t argue with you. However if you are curious, you can check my other comments to the ones that are actually giving arguments without being personal.