Alabama is seeking to become the first state to execute a prisoner by making him breathe pure nitrogen.

The Alabama attorney general’s office on Friday asked the state Supreme Court to set an execution date for death row inmate Kenneth Eugene Smith, 58. The court filing indicated Alabama plans to put him to death by nitrogen hypoxia, an execution method that is authorized in three states but has never been used.

Nitrogen hypoxia is caused by forcing the inmate to breathe only nitrogen, depriving them of oxygen and causing them to die. Nitrogen makes up 78% of the air inhaled by humans and is harmless when inhaled with oxygen. While proponents of the new method have theorized it would be painless, opponents have likened it to human experimentation.

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a pretty good way to go, apparently.

    But there have been an absolutely breathtaking number of death row cases that have been overturned due to new evidence that had exonerated the condemned.

    It seems pretty clear that the state is doing a very crappy job of determining guilt, and therefore shouldn’t be handing down such a permanent sentence.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to fully pro death penalty, especially for some of the sick fucks…

      But then I learned about all the false convictions, some COERCED by the fucking police, and since then I’m 100% against the death penalty.

      The satisfaction I get from a heinous killer getting killed, does not outweigh the horror I feel for even one innocent life being taken by the state.

      • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also cheaper to keep people in jail forever than put them to death because of all the appeals. And despite being more careful, we still get it wrong.

        • Agent_of_Kayos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Also, in my mind, death is a release. Keep those fuckers stuck in their filty meat suits while they rot in prison for the rest of their lives with no hope for escape. The especially heinous ones will get extra comeuppance from the other inmates

    • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what changed my mind on the death penalty. I have no problem putting a murderer or pedo to death, but we keep freeing people when new evidence is found that proves their innocents. Until we can get it right 100% of the time, we should just lock them up until death.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is one reason why I generally don’t support the death penalty. There’s no way to undo it. At least if evidence exonerates someone 50 years later, they’re still alive.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would argue that we need the death penalty as a way to protect society from the absolutely most dangerous criminals but it’s very frequently misapplied. I would say, for instance, that people that are serial killers, or serial rapists (or serial child molesters), people for whom there is no significant doubt that they’re guilty, and people that will reoffend if they ever manage to get out of prison, should be executed. A simple murder for hire, or a robbery? No. Ed Kemper? Absolutely.

      I think that even life sentences with no parole are overused; most people can be rehabilitated and returned to society safely, if we were willing to dramatically overhaul our criminal justice system to not be based on punishment and retribution. (But if we did that, then how would we get free prison labor…? /s)

      • Agent_of_Kayos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Prisons (at least in the US) have never been about prisoners and their reform. It’s about how much money they can bring in from the state and practically free labor. Like most things in the US it is driving by profit margins.

        …yay capitalism

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh, no. We had prisons before we used prisons as a stand-in for chattel slavery. OTOH, we used to kill a lot more people for much less severe offenses, so people didn’t usually end up in jails for very long. And there was a period of time where we believed in reform, but that was well over 100 years ago now.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    FWIW, nitrogen asphyxiation is one of the methods that’s preferred by advocates of assisted suicide. Done correctly–by which I mean in a way that doesn’t allow a buildup of CO2 in your bloodstream–it’s not only painless but gives you a mild high. The proper way to do it is with something like a BiPAP, where the air that’s being piped in is pure nitrogen, and the CO2 is all being removed immediately so you aren’t breathing it back in. Without a buildup of CO2 in your bloodstream, your brain doesn’t recognize that you’re suffocating.

    Have you ever breathed in helium from a balloon and gotten lightheaded? It’s about like that.

    I’m in favor of the death penalty in very, very rare cases–and this is not one where I would support it–and this is one of the surest, least barbaric ways to execute someone.

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Let’s tighten this up a bit.

      Inert gas asphyxiation is very much a great way to go, but it’s basically symptomless until after you lose consciousness.

      You don’t get high. The “high” people get is when they are choked out. I’m not really sure on the mechanism of that, though. You don’t get lightheaded. The lightheadedness is from the blood oxygen levels increasing.

      This is why it’s very dangerous to enter enclosed spaces. You simply don’t know you’re about to die until it’s too late. Plus, people come in to try to rescue you and succumb as well.

      Anyway, lots of people have this experience. It’s a common part of training for rebreathers for use in scuba diving.

      As far as good ways to die, inert gas asphyxiation is up there with “proper” lethal injection (i.e. with a commercial euthanasia drug), opiate overdose, or just anesthetizing the being and doing whatever gets the job done.

      • Meldroc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        IIRC the hypoxia “high” panic reaction is from an elevated level of CO2 - that’s the evolved mechanism by which humans detect they’re in a bad place for breathing. Not absence of O2.

        Edit: Correction: Hypoxia alone gets you high just before you keel over. It’s the CO2 buildup that activates your body’s panic reactions.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually the (small L) libertarians are a little split on this issue, with most seeming to agree with me that the death penalty is a stupid fucking idea from multiple standpoints. Can’t trust the govt to get a damn thing right and that is no-take-backsies so no room for fuck ups (which they definitely have fucked up and killed innocent people, only to learn someone lied after it is too latw.)

      OH you meant the republicans, who say “small government” but then through their actions prove they are just “the other side” of “big government” from the dems. Well, they’re “lying” in order to manipulate people into voting for them (tbf, I know that’s how they all get votes).

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but as long as they have the death penalty, it’s probably best they do it as humanely as possible.

      Some states are bringing back firing squads, which definitely feels like a huge step back. If they’re going to kill someone, using an actual painless option instead of lethal injection or shooting them seems like as much of a step forward as we can get up to actually not executing people.

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. Which is how we end up building FUCKING concentration camps in the country and pave that road for a dictatorship to take over one of, if not the, leading super powers of the world.

      This shit needs to stop and we need to address what is happening in the south before we start having some repeats that end in mass death. Enough is enough.

  • alvvayson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If ever I would need to be killed, this would be my preferred method of leaving the earth.

    Happy to see them try it, even though I am against executing people.

    With hypoxia, you get euphoria prior to death. No suffering, no pain, just a little high to send you off this earth.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Surgical tech here… why not just use Propofol? It’s the shit we use to put people to sleep for surgery.

    It kicks in FAST - when the anesthesiologist pushes that stuff, it can literally take like 5-10 seconds for the patients to go unconscious.

    So… for the death penalty, hit em with the normal dosage to put them to sleep, then once they’re confirmed unconscious, push the rest of the bottle… or a liter of gasoline… or chuck em out the window; it doesn’t matter, as they’ll be 100% unaware of the actual method of death.

    Edit - turns out there’s a lot of good reasons we don’t just use Propofol - see comments below. Thanks for the insight, all!

    • lgmjon64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They used to use thiopental, which is similar to propofol, with similar onset, both as an anesthesic and for lethal injection. Manufacturers stopped producing it because its use was controversial. Now it’s not even available for anesthesia. It would suck if the same thing happened to propofol.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because the people selling it don’t want to deal with the association with lethal injections

    • JdW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      anesthesiologist

      There you have it, qualified medical professionals refuse (and are not allowed to anyway because of the oath) to participate in executions. So the people administring whatever concoction is made are not medically trained nor usually even particularily knowledgable on the subject. And yes, this has caused a series of botched executions, to the extent that the most bloodthirsty states are looking at smimpler ways to execute. Hence this aricle.

    • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They already render the prisoner unconcious when they administer the lethal injection. It’s not 100% effective though, thus the search for a method that doesn’t have the potential to horrify onlookers.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because using your drug to kill people isn’t the best way to convince the public is perfectly safe. There would be a hundred TikToks talking about how anesthesiologists want to murder you with propofol and then claim you died accidentally on the operating table. Who are you going to believe, actual “doctors” or highly qualified TikTok influencers?

      Yeah, no drug company wants to deal with that. That’s why governments have had difficulty sourcing these drugs and instead have been resorting to black market dealers.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Watching the murder states scramble for new ways to murder as they run out of unethical people willing to sell them murder supplies has been interesting.

  • Mowcherie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get that it is ‘humane,’ but I get scared when I see humans developing and organizing highly efficient ways to exterminate humans, such as gas chambers.

    • blendertom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s how it should be. But as with most things, it comes down to money. It’s cheaper to execute.

      • Roboticide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        All you have to do is look at the times the government has got it wrong on convictions of people who turned out innocent to realize maybe the government shouldn’t make the decision to kill people.

        Look up the innocence project.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capital punishment is government sanctioned killing. Outside of war, the government should not have the power to kill anyone.

        For these people, death is also the easy way out. Prison time is harder.

        Not to mention cost. The complexity, finality, and litigation drive cost through the roof and make it much more expensive than life in prison.

      • SuckMyKiss@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.

  • Pat12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Smith was one of two men paid $1,000 each to murder Elizabeth Sennett on behalf of her preacher husband, Charles Sennett Sr., who was in debt and wanted to collect life insurance money.”

    Hold on, so why is he being executed? He wasn’t the one who ordered the murder. It seems like lots of other people request murders but those people aren’t sentenced to death.

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because he accepted money in exchange to brutally beat and stabbed a person to death. “Just following orders,” has never been an acceptable excuse for an individual to commit a crime, but especially when it’s not an order in a military hierarchy, it’s payment and a voluntary agreement. Fuck him.

      Sennet Sr. committed suicide the moment the police started to investigate him. That’s why he’s not about to be executed.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think that was the argument being made. The argument, to me, is why sentenced to death instead of some other sentence. And, were the others that are also part of this crime sentenced.

        The article doesn’t seem to say anything about what happened to the others that are involved. Focused a lot on the execution method.

        Sounds like the guy just did this for the money so I also don’t understand why he’s being sentenced to death. Should just be prison time. But, I don’t have all the facts here.

        • Roboticide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He’s sentenced to death because he committed a capital murder in a state with the death penalty and a jury found him guilty. “I did it for money” is not exactly a legal defense. An innocent person was still killed, and arguably doing it for money is worse. Fuck him.

          The other guy involved in the killing has already been executed, over ten years ago. It’s a well documented case and took me about a minute of Googling to figure out this guy isn’t particularly being singled out for death and the other got a lighter sentence.

          I personally don’t believe in the death penalty, but also if he didn’t want to be executed for murder, he shouldn’t have committed murder in the deep south.

  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok, but bear with me here, because for real, this is how I want to go, and how I plan to put down my fowl when they get too old to live comfortably, because there’s no stress involved to taint the meat, and I can feel comfortable with myself for giving them a good life with free roam, and a good end.

    It’s incredibly humane. You feel nothing and don’t know you are suffocating. If you’ve ever breathed helium, you know what nitrogen feels like - literally nothing. This happened to multiple individuals in space because nitrogen is not flammable, and is why they now use 6% co2 in non-oxygenated spaces.

    The body does not care if it has oxygen, that’s hard to test for biologically because oxygen is highly reactive, what it does test for is buildup of co2. As long as you can breathe out the co2, your body knows nothing.

    So if they are going to kill other humans, this is the way to go. I don’t agree with doing that non-voluntarily, but if it’s going to happen this is at least humane.

  • Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I am by no means pro death penalty, but I prefer this over the lethal injection. It’s a very painful and horrifying way to go and not at all like the drugs they give someone for medical euthanasia, while suffocating on nitrogen is actually relatively painless.

  • PlanetOfOrd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    While proponents of the new method have theorized it would be painless, opponents have likened it to human experimentation.

    Isn’t that how we’re doing the death penalty anyway? We’re trying to find a “painless” way to kill someone, but is there ever really a painless way to do this? I’d imagine even if I’m sitting in a massage chair with classical music playing it wouldn’t matter if I knew that half an hour from now I wouldn’t be leaving the room.

    And we can’t really ask doctors because doctors have taken an oath to “do no harm.”

    The death penalty is just a punishment no one wants to do (well, okay, I’m sure there are plenty of people that have no problem with it), but we’ve told ourselves that we have to do it.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only are there plenty of people who have no problem with it, there’s plenty of people who will be upset the killing wasn’t more barbaric.

      And it’s pure blood-lust. They know the criminal can never reoffend. They know the death won’t bring back the victims or bring peace to their family. They know it won’t stop other people committing the same crime. They weren’t impacted by the crime in the slightest and don’t seem to have any real compassion for those who were.

      But they want to see the criminals fry anyway.

      Threads like this make it extremely clear the the reason the western world isn’t executing women in soccer stadiums is because the people who make those decisions said “no”, not because it wouldn’t draw a crowd.

      • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, if this takes off, we can absolutely expect people to start complaining that death row criminals are getting off easy.

        People will pull out the usual excuses for cruelty in our criminal justice system “well, their victim didn’t get a peaceful death!” and shit like that. As though making the perpetrator (and it’s always a possibility that they were falsely convicted) suffer an agonizing death will retroactively lessen the victims stuffering.

        Its sick, but it’s absolutely going to happen.

    • Meldroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll admit, it’s an improvement over previous methods, though that’s not saying much. Everything’s normal, breathing fine, until lights out!

      My objection to the death penalty is that sooner or later, it’s inevitable, the law will fuck it up and execute innocent people. Some people just can’t do adulting around this. Sooner or later, a crime happens, people clamor for blood, the state rounds up the wrong guy and railroads him.