• R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both are just as unlikely as the other and have as much evidence, I’d find anyone who possesed both beliefs to be weird.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One is obviously made-up by ancient peoples who knew fuck-all about the world, but insists it’s eternal truth beyond debate. Even the parts that contradict the other parts.

      The other is an openly hypothetical idea based on what we expect is just beyond our current capabilities… and it relies on that we’re-just-atoms materialism.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not true

      1. We have no evidence about either and both are non-falsifiable
      2. Living in a simulation is one idea. Each individual religion is a whole bunch of assumptions rolled into one system.

      Therefore “we live in a simulation” is just as likely as “there’s some higher power”, while “the Matrix is a documentary, everything will happen exactly like in the movie” is as likely as “the Christian god is real, just as described in the bible”.