• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was the joke, which I was trying to help further by pretending that there was nothing wrong with that.

      • Hazmatastic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, you could just convert the Farenheit or Celsius degrees to radians like they were angle degrees. “Bake at 6.109 radians for 45 minutes” still can mean “Bake at 350 degrees for 45 minutes” if you accept the implicit Farenheit scale. Radians would still be ambiguous regarding the base scale used, but it’s as ambiguous as “degrees” is so not really an issue.

        So I mean, there’s no real reason to do it but also no reason you can’t.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    My scale for expressing mean kinetic energy flux is superior to your scale for expressing mean kinetic energy flux. I have formed an identity around this and will smugly argue about it on the internet.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey now, I don’t argue for Celsius, I just argue against people saying Fahrenheit is better for silly reasons.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Joule is the best unit you can literally apply it to everything because it’s essentially a raw unit of energy.