• BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not convinced any online-only games are worth anyone’s time if they’re planned as a live service game from the get-go. When Halo: Infinite F2P multiplayer dropped, so many people on the Halo subreddit were like “yeah, it’s fun but the battlepass is so slow to progress that I feel like I don’t have a reason to keep playing.” Uhhhhh maybe keep playing because you’re having fun? Or do you need some artificial number to tell you to keep going?

    Seems like a confusing shift in the target demographic where battlepasses and constant new updates are required in order to consider a game “worth your time.”

    squeaky old man voice back in my day my brothers and I would play CoD: Zombies using the exact same strategies every day after school for years with no updates to the gameplay AND WE LIKED IT

    • jose1324@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I don’t get it either. Everyone rn is saying that Halo infinite multiplayer sucks because you “have to” pay for cosmetics or do lots of shit to progress the battlepass.

      Literally all COSMETIC. Like it’s not even pay to win, just play the genuinely fun multiplayer game wtf

      • alienanimals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Halo Infinite’s problem isn’t that there’s a store where you can buy cosmetic items. It’s that the game was built AROUND the store. Cosmetics took a priority over gameplay, features, etc.

      • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, if the game is fun then ignore the cosmetics. If you like the cosmetics enough, then buy the cosmetics. As long as gameplay elements aren’t locked behind a paywall, I see no problem.

  • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Naughty dog’s average customer is not interested to online games. It would have flopped

    Bad idea starting, good idea stopping before too late

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have hard time believing they had this great product they just didn’t want to support for a few years. Specially with how Sony has been dead set on having many live service games in its portfolio.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Specially with how Sony has been dead set on having many live service games in its portfolio.

      the previous CEO was dead set on that, but he’s gone

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s been three years. It’s 2023.

          The answer is “Yes, that was a bit of an overreaction. The last few years have felt like a lot longer than that with the pandemic and everything!”

  • Plantfoodclock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Controversial opinion but I actually am kinda sad to hear this. I remember really liking the OG Factions multiplayer games in TLOU 1. It was really refreshing at the time for multiplayer shooters, since you needed a lot of tactics and teamwork to get resources in order to craft tools and take out their other team. Really nerve-wracking, engaging gameplay at the time. And since you had one life per round, you couldn’t just run and gun like in CoD/BF.

    I know that the multiplayer game they were coming out with wasn’t like this, but I would’ve been happy to play Factions again and relive the old days. Probably one of the last games that I’ve really enjoyed a multiplayer shooter.

  • Frogster8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Must’ve been because it required more effort than releasing the same thing over and over for full price with a new coat of paint