• Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Listen, if someone gets physical access to a device in your home that’s connected to your wifi all bets are off. Having a password to gain access via adb is irrelevant. The attack scenario you describe is absurd: If someone’s in a celebrity’s home they’re not going to go after the robot vacuum when the thermostat, tablets, computers, TV, router, access point, etc are right there.

    If they’re physically in the home, they’ve already been compromised. The fact that the owner of a device can open it up and gain root is irrelevant.

    Furthermore, since they have root they can add a password themselves! Something they can’t do with a lot of other things in their home that they supposedly “own” but don’t have that power (but I’m 100% certain have vulnerabilities).

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      they’re not going to go after the robot vacuum when the thermostat, tablets, computers, TV, router, access point, etc are right there.

      … and all of those things should be equally protected

      they’re going to go for the easiest thing to extract information or escalate

      since they have root they can add a password themselves!

      the most absurd thing is assuming that an end-user is going do add a root password to a serial interface

      i’m not saying end users shouldn’t be able to gain root somehow, simply that it shouldn’t be wide open by default… there should be some process, perhaps involving a unique password per device