Deceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoup and atomquokk.auimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1559arrow-down18
arrow-up1551arrow-down1imageup and atomquokk.auDeceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squaremidribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up103·3 days agoSplitting a heavy U-235 atom, given perfect conversion to electricity, could power a 1 Watt nightlight for around 7.5x10^-13 seconds
minus-squareVince@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·3 days agoThis was just the question I wanted answered
minus-squaremidribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·3 days agoOne could say I gave you what you Watt-ed.
minus-squareMajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 days agoYes, hello Physicists, how do I put someone else’s comment in the collider?
minus-squareOtter@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·edit-23 days agoMaybe they had trouble hitting that atom, and decided to surround with many other U-235 atom before trying the split
minus-squareturdcollector69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·3 days agoThat’s forever in Planck time
minus-squarenomecks@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoThey’re fighting over an atom, they’re probably not that big
minus-squarethatKamGuy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoAround 7.66 x10-3 nanograms
Splitting a heavy U-235 atom, given perfect conversion to electricity, could power a 1 Watt nightlight for around 7.5x10^-13 seconds
This was just the question I wanted answered
One could say I gave you what you Watt-ed.
Yes, hello Physicists, how do I put someone else’s comment in the collider?
Maybe they had trouble hitting that atom, and decided to surround with many other U-235 atom before trying the split
That’s forever in Planck time
They’re fighting over an atom, they’re probably not that big
Life is unfair.
How many tons of TNT is that?
Around 7.66 x10-3 nanograms
Much easier to split many