• FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I had always learned if it has seeds (in nature) then it was a fruit, otherwise it was a vegetable or something else

    • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The definition strictly is “fruiting body”, that their flower head goes through a process of becoming a fruiting body

    • geissi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      if it has seeds (in nature) then it was a fruit, otherwise it was a vegetable

      Many vegetables have seeds.
      Pumpkins are already in the example, but think peppers, legumes

        • SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The thing is fruit/vegetable is not a category in botany. Fruit exists, and it kinda has that definition, that it carries seeds, but that doesn’t serve to distinguish it from vegetables.

          Fruit/vegetable is a culinary distinction, rather than a scientific one.

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            And this is the whole point of the controversy: The same word can have multiple meanings in different contexts and some people have trouble with that concept.