• Vinny_93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    What did dude think was coming out of the VGA port? Tiny photographs? It’s all electricity through wires, of course it’ll send some electricity into a phone

    • Sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s sending out the pixels, silly! A stream of little pixels in neat little rows.

    • TimeNaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah but is the voltage correct? It should be 5V to charge a phone over USB, is that part of the VGA spec?

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Doesn’t matter. The VGA to HDMI adapter is active, not passive, so it matters if HDMI has a 5v rail, not VGA

        • Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          If, hypothetically, VGA didn’t have a 5v rail then how would power get from the monitor to the HDMI adapter. It would absolutely have to be a part of the spec.

          • knight_alva@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If the vga/hdmi adapter is active then this abomination could actually pass display information provided you had a micro-usb device that supported display out over usb (idk if there is such a thing and if so it probably doesn’t work all that well but still)

          • Anivia@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It doesn’t need to be 5v. An active adapter can have a buck converter.

            In reality active HDMI adapters get powered by the HDMI device though, not the VGA monitor, so it’s a moot point anyways

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        With USB power delivery, you can get 9V, 12V or higher over USB. Usually the device requests higher voltage from a PD charger, but it’s not impossible for a modern device to be able to cope with just having 12V shoved into it.

        • FishFace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          The USB device would have been made wrong if it just shoved 12V down the power lines without negotiating it.

          • zurohki@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That’s probably only true for USB power supplies - a USB adapter isn’t set up to do anything with voltage and probably just passes the positive and negative pins through.

            The VGA adapter feeding power back through USB in the first place, yeah, that’s not supposed to happen.

            • FishFace@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 minutes ago

              Put it this way, either the standard on the other end of the adapter specifies 5V, or the adapter doesn’t just pass it through, or the adapter is broken!

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah I don’t think there’s a 5V pin for VGA.

        I think if we had the scenario where we had a higher voltage than needed, we could have a toasty voltage regulator making something happen, but going the other way would need boost circuitry unlikely to exist in these parts, in my understanding

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t know shit about cables but it’s plugged into a monitor. My intuition is that a monitor shouldn’t be pushing power out through a video input port.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        DisplayPort has a +3.3V 500mA pin specifically for pushing power. In theory, great for powering an active adapter. In practice, has killed motherboards because Dell can’t design a computer for shit.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Friendly reminder that if you use a Dell charger on a HP, nothing happens but vice versa, you damage the motherboard. It kills a chip used for charging. Dell used the same size barrel jack, but they wired it differently from everyone.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The monitor has to send some data to the computer to tell it what screen resolutions it accepts. VGA, HDMI, and DisplayPort will all do that for sure. Less certain about component, composite, and S-Video.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Signals aren’t magic, they consist of electrical power. You can get at least a little bit of power from anything that isn’t an optical port.

        • Ferk@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Technically, even an optical port can deliver power. Light is just a particular form of electromagnetic wave that just happens to use another method of transmission (and you might need a different mechanism to transform its energy), but it also has an intensity, potential energy and resistance in the medium of propagation.

        • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe somewhere in the chain, the 5V from pin 9 is being converted to 5V shared across power and the video signal. So even if this chain worked in carrying a video signal it could be very weak or distorted.

          Purely a guess though.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    IF the phone can output enough power with it’s OTG port AND has the correct drivers for that cheap-ass looking USB framebuffer graphics thing AND that’s an active HDMI to VGA adapter rather than some shitty vendor-specific implementation based on some unholy bastardisation AND the phone supports external displays… then I still don’t think it’d work, tbh (but it won’t (it might though (it won’t))).

    • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      At this point, I’m more impressed that there’s always someone ready to share the relevant xkcd, than I am that there happens to be a relevant xkcd for everything.

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yup. VGA - HDMI and HDMI - USB should be working as intended. I have a HDMI - USB-c for my tablet’s second monitor that works just fine.

    • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even with a data-capable cable I don’t think most microUSB ports have video output capabilities. You’d have to find a cable/adapter specifically designed for video out, and a device with the explicit capability (usually cameras and phones).

  • QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    yeah? well I have a
    wall outlet › USB-A › Micro USB › USB-C › THC
    adapter, how about that? (it just ends in my rechargeable cart)

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    My old tower pc used to give wicked electric shocks off the hdmi ports. Pretty sure I could have run space heaters off those fuckers

  • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    This pissed me off so much that I accidentally backed out and up voted a post I didn’t even look at. Fuck you, sir.

      • causepix@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The only time I’ve encountered VGA was my first year as an intern, my office had given me a 4:3 flat screen monitor which frequently gave me migraines. Thing had to be older than me. That was 7 years ago.

        If I encountered it before that, I wasn’t aware of it because I was a child and wasn’t responsible for plugging in the monitors I was using.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      What did you use then? I remember cheap monitors in the early 00s ONLY having VGA. By the time I’d moved on, HDMI was so ubiquitous, I skipped DVI instead.

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you were rich enough, could have only used displays with RGB-BNC.

        Or maybe they’re kinda crazy and used Component video with a TV screen. (Or composite…)

        Or maybe they’re just not that old.

        • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve never even heard of video over BNC, and my searches turn up SCART adapters, so I’m guessing it was a British thing?

          I think we were talking about computer monitors, not televisions.

          • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            BNC connections were used on professional level video equipment, if you were rich enough, you could get an extremely high quality computer monitor and video card that used those.

            Older computers, especially early home computers sometimes just had composite connectors to a TV. Older computer monitors often had a composite input, but SCART was also an option.

            Higher end computer monitors sometimes had similar inputs to early HDTVs, there’s a lot of crossover.

      • CabbageRelish@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Monitors at Walmart still have VGA available, so someone must be using it.

        Also a bit weird in that they have a “modern” set of just VGA/HDMI, as a monitor of the period would have DVI, too. Think DVI wasn’t ever really a thing except for power users though.

      • teslasaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thats cute. There are so, so many machines that have vga still in my field.

        Basically every hmi panel in existence use vga still. And password-less vnc.

    • ghterve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I remember when CGA and EGA were normal and then this fancy new VGA came out but only on fancy high end computers and monitors.

    • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It used to be that a monitor was fancy if it had DVI and really fancy if it had HDMI