President Donald Trump on Thursday announced a new round of punishing tariffs, saying the United States will impose a 100% tariff on imported branded drugs, 25% tariff on imports of all heavy-duty trucks and 50% tariffs on kitchen cabinets.

Trump also said he would start charging a 30% tariff on upholstered furniture next week.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    will impose a 100% tariff on imported branded drugs,

    Finally! Haven’t we been saying for years now that prescriptions are too cheap, and we really should be paying a lot more?

    /s

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Bro, the king is immune to the law. Who cares what the courts say? Literally. Lmao.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well see you have to remember this is a matter of national security. It is an emergency of such immediate necessity he couldn’t ask Congress which both parts of are majority Republican, to just write it into law so it were done properly.

    • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Was that settled or is it in challenge status? I’ve seen no rebate of tarriffs going to the rich people that didn’t pay them yet.

  • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Future economists are going to love this time period. It’s basically a goldmine for papers, articles and books about the effects tariffs have. Sure, we have that sort of history already, but this time it’s very well documented. Current online economy has so many new numbers you can track. You should be able to look at the data and tell exactly what went wrong and how it was reflected on everything.

    • manxu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s sort of like when we want to know something, but all experiments to find out would be highly unethical. So we wait for a madman or authoritarian regime to torture someone to find out the limits of human capability. Just with the economy instead.

      Basically, in 2025 we are running a simulation to find out how much stress an economy can take before it collapses, and the goal is to actually get there.

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Same goes for chemical safety. How do we know what the effects of mercury, lead, ammonia or sulfur dioxide are on humans? Tragic things have happened in the past, and the survivors just documented the results.

        • sramder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, but you can’t Gauge everything that way…

          Or bleach… we should have great information on the maximum amount of ordinary household bleach that a human being can drink at this point.

          To google scholar mobile chum!

          • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            With observational incident reports you can only get a list of symptoms and a very rough range of exposure. If you want something more detailed than that, you need a proper LD50 study.

            • sramder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              That’s fair. Not being an actual sciencer, approximately how many anit-vaxers would I need to deliver? Like you can probably round to the nearest truckload or something like that.

              I think I’m gonna go somewhere and find a new edge to lord over. Maybe even touch some grass… This is getting far too close to history :-(

              • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                A good rule of thumb in statistics is that a sample size of about 30 will give you some idea of the standard deviation. Anything less than that, and your analysis is on shaky ground. In logistics terms, all you need to get started is just one truck load of anti-vaxxers.

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Economics is a messy science where you’re constantly dealing with messy data. There are always several variables at play, and their countless interactions make interpretations super tricky. You can’t really make controlled double blind experiments to isolate the effect of a specific variable.

          • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’s still in its infancy. Give it a few centuries. Back in the 1400s physics was still full of opinions rather than theories backed up by empirical experiments. Economics hasn’t even figured out what the elementary particles or fundamental forces really are or how to measure them. That’s why all the models are pretty vague and qualitative at the moment.

        • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh yes this is just extra messy. Like the federal reserve being robbed by several loosely cooperating gangs with differing goals… During a riot caused by yet another group of gangs some of whom overlap.

          A forensic nightmare within a clusterfuck.

  • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Whee, another round of tariff roulette!

    Even a pinko like me understands that everchanging random rules ain’t good for business.

    • Mose13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      1000% terrifs on Lemmy comments federated from other countries, because DougHolland made fun of me, Mr trump

    • sramder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, but if you sell all those businesses before they find out that they’re in trouble then it’s good for you? I don’t know much about business, but I’m fairly sure this is the way it works.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Are there a lot of heavy trucks imported in the US? All I see from afar are those ancient looking Kenworths, Peterbuilts and the like.

    • M4t1cc@lemmy.worldB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Freightliner, owned by Daimler AG holds almost a 40% market share. Volvo, while not as strong, is around 10%.

      Majority of the US made truck brands have an exorbitantly high maintenance cost when compared to imported trucks.

  • Jonnyprophet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s like you can hear D.T. hanging with his rich buddies…

    “You know, Im thinking of getting into the kitchen cabinet making business, but I don’t think I’ll be able to turn a profit with all the competition.”

    “Here, hold the bong and let me make some calls.”