• WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Even in recent years the NRA has been mixed at best when it comes to minority gun ownership. Think of all those cases where a cop shoots a black man because “they thought they saw a gun.” Whenever that happens, it’s crickets from the NRA. The cops claim the right to shoot black gun owners, even just perceived black gun owners all the time. Yet the NRA rarely comments on such cases. They should be shouting from the rooftops in such cases. Why the hell does a cop seeing a gun give them permission to shoot someone?

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Nope, the “even” is important. The NRA supports gun control when minority groups are buying guns.

      In contrast to the NRA’s rigid opposition to gun control in today’s America, the organization fought alongside the government for stricter gun regulations in the 1960s. This was part of an effort to keep guns out of the hands of African-Americans as racial tensions in the nation grew. The NRA felt especially threatened by the Black Panthers, whose well-photographed carrying of weapons in public spaces was entirely legal in the state of California, where they were based.

      https://www.history.com/articles/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act