• DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    non-ethical monogamous situationship

    So … sexual slavery?

    I’m having a hard time coming up with another situation that fits that description.

    • macrocarpa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 年前

      It’s a piss take of the ethical non-monogamy apps.

      But if we’re being a bit real - nonconsentual arranged marriages, 50 year age gaps, marriage for money, marriage for convenience etc etc would fit the bill

    • June@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Prob like Ashley Madison or smth that’s focused on married people finding people to cheat with.

      • 1847953620@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 年前

        “situationships” I think is the key operator. Where there’s probably a power dynamic, one person is being led on/getting played, and the other person is the player.

    • havid_dume@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 年前

      It does say non-ethical instead of unethical, whatever that means.

      Also doesn’t clarify what part of the situationship is un/non-ethical, so maybe it’s just about undisclosed political campaign contributions or smth

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        Non-ethical could mean without ethics not in violation of ethics?

        I guess that would mean the relationship has not or could not be defined by petty human rules of conduct. Like telling a supernova or a black hole to clean up it’s mess.