Dr. Moose@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoReject modernity, embrace tradition!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1652arrow-down120
arrow-up1632arrow-down1imageReject modernity, embrace tradition!lemmy.worldDr. Moose@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squarehavid_dume@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years agoIt does say non-ethical instead of unethical, whatever that means. Also doesn’t clarify what part of the situationship is un/non-ethical, so maybe it’s just about undisclosed political campaign contributions or smth
minus-squareafraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoNon-ethical could mean without ethics not in violation of ethics? I guess that would mean the relationship has not or could not be defined by petty human rules of conduct. Like telling a supernova or a black hole to clean up it’s mess.
minus-square1847953620@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agomaybe the fact the situationship isn’t clarified on purpose is what makes it non-ethical
It does say non-ethical instead of unethical, whatever that means.
Also doesn’t clarify what part of the situationship is un/non-ethical, so maybe it’s just about undisclosed political campaign contributions or smth
Non-ethical could mean without ethics not in violation of ethics?
I guess that would mean the relationship has not or could not be defined by petty human rules of conduct. Like telling a supernova or a black hole to clean up it’s mess.
maybe the fact the situationship isn’t clarified on purpose is what makes it non-ethical