compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoMeta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comexternal-linkmessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up1779arrow-down118cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1761arrow-down1external-linkMeta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comcompostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square153fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up110arrow-down1·1 day agoWe’re in the dumbest possible timeline.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down18·1 day agoWe’re in the only timeline.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 hours agoAs sure as anyone can be. For all purposes as far as affects anyone here, yes.
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down2·1 day agoThat doesn’t disprove my statement.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·1 day agoNo, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 day agoOK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoYes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
minus-squareOrteilGenou@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·edit-222 hours agoWe’re in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 day agoIf there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
minus-squarecabillaud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 day agoThat is a good example of talking to say nothing imo
We’re in the dumbest possible timeline.
We’re in the only timeline.
Are you sure?
As sure as anyone can be.
For all purposes as far as affects anyone here, yes.
That doesn’t disprove my statement.
No, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail.
Not even a little.
OK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
Yes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
That too.
We’re in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string
If there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo