Legislature Building? Around Courthouses? Banks? Public Transit? Schools? Traffic? On the Streets? Should they exist in all of these places, only some of them, or none at all? What’s your opinion?

(Btw: I remember my highschool had them, felt kinda creepy since I distrust the school admin, like… even the other places with cameras didn’t feel as weird)

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I was just thinking about this the other day. Cameras can be a powerful tool, but in the same way as an axe is a powerful tool. It’s all about whose hands wield them, and to what end. I’m loathe to prohibit them as often they are the most reliable witness to events, but I also don’t trust essentially anyone to wield their power on a day to day basis. Companies want to use them to collect data for marketing purposes. Governments want to use them to suppress dissent. People want them because they are marketed as making you safer, but most people would probably get as much benefit from a fake security camera as from the most expensive real camera. The systems can become harmful themselves without careful setup and maintenance due to malicious actors. (mirai) How do you empower beneficial uses without empowering malicious ones? I don’t really have an answer. I just recognize it as another facet in the larger question of proliferation of powerful tools.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think a good way to enable beneficial use while minimizing the possibility of harm is to avoid cloud based services as much as possible. Especially for residential use. If companies made a convenient method of plug and play self hosted cameras, it’d be a hit. But you cant beat the convenienceand price of another mega corp cheap cloud based security camera

      • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I like the idea but I won’t rate it as likely. ‘Plug n play’ and ‘self-hosted’ are generally not compatible concepts, especially for consumer-type users, much less with ‘affordable’ tossed into the mix. Even just self-hosted by itself is a bit of a reach for most people.

        • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 minutes ago

          Perhaps self hosted wasn’t the right term. What I was going for was locally hosted. It woulf be a single device with OS and drives all installed. It would not be affordable, but it’s the only way to make it convenient