JERUSALEM (AP) — The head of surgery at Gaza’s largest and most advanced hospital held up his phone Saturday to the hammering of gunfire and artillery shelling. “Listen,” said Dr. Marwan Abu Sada as fighting raged around Shifa Hospital.

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Kinda similar to the “human shields” argument. When I read comics growing up, when a villain takes a hostage the answer was never “kill the hostage” except for the edgiest of antiheroes, yet here we are with “human shields” being used as a justification to kill civilians. It’s fucking wild.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wonder if a lot of people’s idea of war has been shaped by the recent American occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, which were wars of choice where at least in theory American soldiers were fighting largely for the benefit of the natives. Countries that believe they actually need to win and don’t have the option of just giving up and going home fight wars in a very different way. Consider for example World War II, the proverbial “good versus evil” war fought by the generation that originally came up with the comic book characters you read about. The Allies certainly didn’t hesitate to kill enormous numbers of Axis civilians in the course of destroying military targets. (IMO the Allies actually went way too far and a lot of the strategic bombing of Germany and Japan served no military purpose, but I suppose they were more worried about bombing too little than they were about bombing too much.)

      • Nobody@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The total war tactics of WW2 are unthinkable by modern standards, but it’s hard not to sympathize with an outgunned army fighting for their home. They fight because they’d rather die than lose.

        Maybe instead of fighting people in that position, you talk to them and work out a peace deal. If they’re willing to be reasonable, end the violence.

              • fluke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                30
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Didn’t happen in a vacuum though, did it.

                Do not confuse me saying that with sympathising with Hamas. It is possible to recognise that both sides have bloody hands, and have done for decades.

                • steventhedev@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  21
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Can you explain what you mean by “Didn’t happen in a vacuum”?

                  Best I can figure is that you disagree with the act itself, but agree with their motives or desires. But I really don’t want to assume, and would prefer to understand from you.

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Israel attacked, at a minimum, 17 years ago.

                Blockading a country is an act of war.

  • HowMany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because Israel is committing war crimes. Because Israel has stated, unequivocally, that Palestinians are animals and must be scourged off the face of the earth.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Intentionally targeting civilians is a war crime.

        And before you bring up human shields, the only ones to do so were the Israelis in operation Cast Lead. Read up on it of you don’t know. If you do and still say this, then you’re a genocidaire and I don’t give a shit what you say.

    • Argonne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      And also because Hamas is using Hospitals as base of operations because they will get sympathy for it and human shields. No side is right here

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You really think using human shields is really a good excuse to bomb hospitals. “they’re using hostages! Quick teach those hostages a goddamn guided 2000lb lesson!”

        • FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, let’s just let Hamas murder millions. They’re invincible because all they have to do is grab the nearest civilian.

          Get the fuck outta here with that idiotic child logic…

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Get the fuck out of here justifying genocide.

            Never again was for everyone.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Look hamas killing “millions” is unlikely given they haven’t topped 5000.

            Coolio. So lemme grab your kids take them hostage and you can tell me again that murdering me and your children is the only solution to hostage situation.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is clear evidence that at least some hospitals were alleged to be Hamas operation centers but in fact were not. But even if they were operation centers, would you still think it’s justified? How many Hamas members are worth how many “accidental” deaths of hospital staff and patients? Who would even dream of making such a formula? It’s sick.

        The issue at hand is about hospitals being destroyed, not about the Israel-Palestine conflict on the whole. Please save your “no side is right” language for an issue where that actually applies.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given most people aren’t reading the article, the particularly relevant points:

    International humanitarian law lends hospitals special protections during war. But hospitals can lose their protections if combatants use them to hide fighters or store weapons, the International Committee of the Red Cross said. […]

    In an editorial published Friday in Britain’s The Guardian newspaper, International Criminal Court prosecutor Karim Khan issued a warning to combatants that the burden of proof is on them if they claim hospitals, schools or houses of worship have lost their protected status because they are being used for military purposes. And the bar for evidence is very high.

    “If there is a doubt that a civilian object has lost its protective status, the attacker must assume that it is protected,” Khan wrote. “The burden of demonstrating that this protective status is lost rests with those who fire the gun, the missile, or the rocket in question.”

    TL;DR: If Hamas is conducting military operations from hospitals, they can be legitimate targets in the eyes of international law, but precautions still need to be taken to avoid civilian casualties and the case for their military use should be overwhelming, not amorphous or tenuous.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a terrible headline. If APNews thinks it’s a war crime, it has a duty to say so. You can’t just write a headline like this without drawing the obvious inference.

      • stewsters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well it’s kind of open to interpretation, which may be why they didn’t want to directly say that, just imply it.

        Article 19 of the Geneva convention:

        The protection to which civilian hospitals are entitled shall not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy. Protection may, however, cease only after due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit, and after such warning has remained unheeded.

        Now are firing qassam rockets “harmful to the enemy”? Probably.

        Has due warning been given? Maybe? It’s not well defined what that means. Does roof knocking count? Do you need to submit a form to their embassy?

        I think the big problem is that the kind of warfare we are seeing here is unlike what they saw when they wrote those laws.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is written in the passive. That’s intentional; it’s a classic approach that writers use to dodge the issue. It’s not OK and we shouldn’t excuse it.

  • Motavader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because both sides are fighting are major assholes. Hamas does hide arms and fighters in and around hospitals. Israel doesn’t hold back attacking the hospitals to get at that gear, because they care more about killing Hamas than saving Palestinians. The civilians in Gaza are surrounded by assholes.

  • MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Crazy thought, why don’t we just not bomb hospitals? Anyone?

    Or how to make people hate you more than Hamas, a book by the IDF.

  • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are hospitals in Gaza under Israel’s crosshairs? Why? Is it truly that difficult to step back and think for a moment about why Israel would want to erase the current populace entirely?

    Amazing, what a mystery

    • whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure why you’re being downvoted… Israel an ethnostate, and what we’re seeing here are the early stages of a genocide. Look at any other ethnic cleansing in history, and you’ll easily see the parallels.

      • Argonne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel is definitely not an ethnostate. It has 20% Arabs. How many Jews does Palestine have?

        • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Calling a state an Ethnostate doesn’t mean you’re saying the population is entirely of one ethnicity. It means one ethnicity is given a privileged status above all others.

          Israel was founded when Zionists purged Palestinians from their homes and forced them into Gaza and the West Bank in order to create a Jewish majority state. That makes Israel an ethnostate by definition.

            • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ahh I see. So because Zionists haven’t been able to successfully cleanse all Palestinians from the region, Israel doesn’t count as an ethnostate. Don’t worry though because by God they’re still trying their damndest to make it happen no matter how many thousands of children they have to murder.

            • Count042@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              No they don’t, many surviving people who suffered oppression under apartheid south Africa have stated that the Palestinians are treated worse.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Israel has a law requiring Jewish people maintain demographic majority.

          It is the definition of an ethno state.

          Not only that, but it is a removed supremacist ethno state.

          Look up how they treat the Beta Israelis.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        War does not automatically equate to being a genocide just because people due. Otherwise, every war in history would.be genocide.

        There are Arabs & Palestinians that serve in the IDF too and have killed Palestinians. There are other Arabs in Jordan and Syria who have also gone to war against Palestine.

        You are using incindiary rhetoric to win an online argument, but your description doesn’t fit the facts.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re literally using the same arguments every genocidal government has used to justify their genocides in history.

    • OneNot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know why people insist on this narrative. Isn’t the truth horrible enough? Hamas is allegedly using hospitals as shields, which is horrible. Israel is willing to kill countless civilians to get at Hamas, which is also horrible.

      • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it’s what Israeli politicians and government officials actually believe. They aren’t even quiet about it. It’s genuinely not hard to prove the genocidal intent of the Israeli government.

        Unfortunately western media just tends to gloss over it all. I’m not sure if reporters can’t fathom the US supporting ethnic cleansing or if they just want to avoid the flack they’d receive by being honest. Either way, it’s unfortunate because well meaning liberals are left to assume Israel genuinely cares about stopping Hamas and aren’t using them as a pretext to ethnically cleanse the Gaza strip.

        • cuibono@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately western media just tends to gloss over it all. I’m not sure if reporters can’t fathom the US supporting ethnic cleansing or if they just want to avoid the flack they’d receive by being honest.

          Please watch a documentary that covers any of the previous foreign wars the US has been in, especially those that came about before the internet boom (or better yet, one before and one after). I personally like to recommend the Panama Deception because it’s free on youtube and pretty short and succinct (only 90 min). On top of that Panama is still currently dealing with the issues started and maintained during the “wars” discussed in that documentary (I don’t knowing if you’ve seen about the ongoing Canadian mining protests).

          The documentary covers some of what happened obviously, but it also shows some of the news airing at the time from the biggest American news channels that were covering the wars and how they covered it. You’d be amazed at what was claimed at home vs what was happening overseas. The MSM may as well have been a third arm of the US government. As much as they like to pretend to be neutral on domestic affairs which the people watching would easily be able to criticize, it should really be no shock to anyone that they’d mostly be parroting US gov talking points when it comes to foreign affairs.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I mean there are people in the Israeli Government calling all Palestinians (not just Hamas) “animals”, others who say that Palestinians won’t be allowed to get back to Northern Gaza and there’s even a member of that Government who seriously suggested Israel should nuke Gaza.

      And then, of course, there is the long track record of Israel doing things like murdering journalists and killing Palestinian kids throwing rocks at their armored diggers, especially under governments with these same people in them.

      People who have a track record of murdering journalists and children, bombing hospitals full of those they see as “animals” which they want to see dead or out of Gaza, and then providing to the World some unverifiable excuse that blames somebody else and doesn’t even pass the sniff test when it comes to proportionality in the use of force is hardly out of character, especially because History has various examples of people who think like that going full on mass-murderer in similar ways.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      erase the current populace entirely

      Do you realize that the population of Gaza grows by over 50,000 people every year? Even if we accept the casualty figures provided by Hamas (and I don’t) then unless this war goes on at its current intensity for another four months (which it won’t) the population of Gaza will actually increase rather than decrease in the one-year period that includes the war.

      The idea that the war in Gaza is “[erasing] the current populace entirely” is disconnected from reality.

      • nammi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow.

        Are you literally saying it’s not a genocide because the population is growing faster than the IDF is killing?

        I don’t know what happened to your brain, nor your heart, but I am sad whatever happened to you, happened.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          You did use the term “erase.”. What about all the Palestinians living inside Israel.

          Obviously it sucks that people are dying, but hamas started the war FFS. They 100% knew it would cause huge civilian losses.

          • nammi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you think Hamas «started» anything, read up on the history. It’s a 75 year long illegal occupation.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israel stated the war 17 years ago, minimum.

            Blockades are acts of war.

            This argument is the adult equivalent of grabbing someone’s hand and punching them in the face with it while saying “stop hitting yourself”

            You should be embarrassed for even making this argument.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes.

            Nothing is more corrosive to an armies fighting capabilities then an occupation.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Civilian casualties aren’t the same thing as genocide.

          genocide: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group

          When a country with access to the full destructive power of a modern-day military (including nuclear weapons) fights a war in such a manner that at the end of the war there will be more enemy civilians than there were before the war, it is entirely unreasonable to claim that genocide or any attempt to commit genocide is taking place. You might as well call it cannibalism or pedophilia - those are also really bad things that Israel isn’t actually doing.

          • nammi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Keep telling yourself whatever you need to support your own narratives. I just wanna let you know that I think you are a cold-hearted person, and I hope that you, your family, or your people will never be thought of, as you are thinking and/or talking of the Palestinians right here.

            They are deliberately bombing hospitals, schools and people fleeing. If you cannot open your eyes to see this, but rather argue about the technicalities of semantics to feel better, I wish you good luck in life.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Intentionally withholding food and water when you control all ingress is a way of extirpating a population without bombing and shooting them.

            But so is dropping more explosive power than the two atomic bombs used in Japan into an area the size of Manhattan in a month.

      • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t imagine ever having such a cynical and apathetic worldview. All of this death is acceptable to you because more children will be born? Because they’ll be replaced?

        Set a reminder on your calendar for March, and we’ll take a look at the news at that point. I have a sneaking suspicion that you may be surprised. While you’re at it set a reminder to get some therapy too, christ

  • FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because the Palestinian elected government which happens to be a globally recognized terrorist organization decided to build headquarters below hospitals in hope of exploiting the rule of war you mention.

    Except: doing what they did negates that rule, and all they did was put that entire hospital of their own people in the crosshairs.

    This blood is 100% on the hands of the Palestinian elected government.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hey look, another person that would have shit on Nelson Mandela and the AFC in the 80’s for necklacing and being terrorists and not accepting the legitimacy of apartheid south Africa.

  • Argonne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let this be a symbol of how much Hamas actually cares about the Palestinians. They prefer their own citizens to suffer than for them to be helped.

      • Argonne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fuck me for pointing out that Hamas are also the bad guys? Fuck you if you defend them you terrorist sympathizer

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You would have called the ANC and Nelson Mandela the bad guys in the 80’s if you were alive then.

        • Doorbook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No no, don’t get me wrong. I didn’t say fuck you. I said “go fuck yourself”.

          • Argonne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just to be clear, you are telling me to go fuck myself because I’m pointing out how shitty Hamas is? I’m not defending Israel. You are really taking the mask off there buddy. I would tell you to go fuck yourself, but I have a feeling you already do that anyway

  • thatsage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The way I see it, Israel is doing its best to free the hospital from Hamas with as minimum innocents getting hurt as it can.

    • constate368@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that were true, then they would be sending in troops on the ground instead of indiscriminate bombings.

      • thatsage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are troops on the ground and the bombings are not indiscriminate, but on legitimate military targets.

        • constate368@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          What does the civilian:soldier death ratio need to be in order for it to be considered a ‘legitimate military target’?