Okay, troll.
You have answered no questions, and made no statements that can be falsified.
Just insulted and took no position that could be shown wrong.
You’re just a troll, and a lazy one at that.
Okay, troll.
You have answered no questions, and made no statements that can be falsified.
Just insulted and took no position that could be shown wrong.
You’re just a troll, and a lazy one at that.
America doesn’t have Gympie Gympie trees.
Who supported the Khmer Rouge?
Who ended up fighting and ending the genocide?
Who denied a genocide happened until the 80’s, and continued funding the Khmer Rouge until the late 90’s?
These are all simple questions with simple, factual answers. You just don’t like the picture the answers paint, and want to justify the intentional outcome of Kissinger’s designs and blame the outcome on the victims.
It sickens me to see people like the person I was replying to and yourself try and blame the people who were genocided for their genocide and to blame it on a economic ideology that had very little to do with the outcome.
…
Did you really blame a movement that basically existed for twenty years after relevance through US (and Chinese, interestingly enough) machinations and support, and was actually ousted by the communist Vietnamese, on a ‘kill the oppressors’ view?
Jesus, capitalists will say and do everything to blame the consequences of their actions on everyone else.
People don’t like reading genocidal propaganda.
They have the order wrong, demonstrated by their own links as pointed out by queermunist.
Spoken like someone that hasn’t paid attention to the supply chains of places like Walmart.
We already have command economies. They exist and are functional. The owners are simply siphoning away the surplus value.
backups in the 2 times in your lifetime that such corruption actually occurs.
What are you even talking about here? This line invalidates everything else you’ve said.
The local population for the south is Hezbollah. Or, rather, their very popular base of support is in southern Lebanon. The people in Beirut that Israel likes to bomb, because that is the only type of military operation they are good at, are not the power base of Hezbollah, and often are ideologically opposed to Hezbollah.
Remember, the reason Hezbollah exists is because Israel invaded southern Lebanon, and the people there greeted then as liberators at first (remember, southern Lebanon is ideologically not allied with the people of northern Lebanon, the demographics of Lebanon are what make it a basketcase politically) Until they realized that the Israeli’s were going to take over there and continue to oppress them. Thus was born Hezbollah who successfully drove the Israeli’s out, and then did so again in 2006. Frankly, they’re the best light infantry fighters in that part of the world by a long mile.
The majority of Israeli’s themselves view 2006 as a loss. So far, it looks like even the moderate Israeli’s are viewing this peace deal as a loss.
One of the stupidest ways of viewing who won a war is by looking at death counts.
By that view, America won the Vietnam war, and Nazi Germany defeated the Soviet Union.
I didn’t mean follow as in Twitter. I meant follow as in pay attention to them and the stories they work on.
The Lever.
Drop Site News.
Don’t follow news sources. Follow journalists.
Tell that to them in 2006.
They’ve won everything they have through fighting. Turns out that the Israeli’s, like every other occupying force in history, find being an occupying force to be utterly corrosive to their fighting capabilities. Right now, without air cover, they are nothing.
Who is they?
How were ‘they’ defeated?
What does it mean to be defeated?
Anything from [email protected] is certain to be propaganda.
They’re a genocide supporter.
Yeah, no.
The video evidence is already out. Plus basically every European knows what an ultra is, and will look at the number of injured and comment “wow, that is lower then normal”
This is just ultras who got their asses kicked and are trying to claim victim status.
This is the funniest cope I’ve ever seen for ‘my countries ultras tried to start shit with non-football hooligans and got their asses kicked.’
Fighting people who aren’t women and children without total air superiority isn’t that easy, is it?
Banning slavery is not ‘Doing a favor’.
Buuuuuuuuuuuut…How would they fight wildfires?
Won’t anyone think about the wildfires?
/s (To be clear)
You know, Putin’s methods are the same as the US’s when it comes to overthrowing elected governments, right?
Apply leverage to an existing weak point.
Try to make it undistinguishable from a legitimate reason.
The problem, of course, is that none of this requires a Putin or a CIA to explain it. The actions of the health care industry is perfectly sufficient.