TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 23 days agoWhat old technology are you surprised is still in use today?message-squaremessage-square166fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down11
arrow-up1125arrow-down1message-squareWhat old technology are you surprised is still in use today?TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 23 days agomessage-square166fedilink
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up69arrow-down2·edit-223 days agoIPv4. IPv6 became a recognized standard by 1998. EDIT: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=ipv6-adoption Nearly 30 years later, and less than half of the connections to Google are via IPv6.
minus-squareFrezik@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up25·23 days agoFucking NAT. Never should have been allowed to escape from the lab.
minus-squareChris@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·22 days agoLolol, you’re not wrong. NAT made IPv6 a later problem
minus-squareAnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·22 days agoThere’s no place like 127.0.0.1
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·22 days agoThere’s no place like ::1
minus-squaretankplanker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·22 days agoI can’t understand that gibberish, speak RFC 791 like a true patriot
minus-squarevividspecter@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·22 days agoI’m almost at the point where all of my connections are IPv6, but still hampered by my mobile provider (ironically, since IPv6 was generally adopted earlier on mobile in many countries).
minus-squaremriswith@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-222 days agoBased on how ISPs seem to not get their CGNAT setups right, it’s not going away any time soon.
minus-squaremilk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-222 days agoAs a South African, I have never even seen IPv6. My university has two /16 blocks and no NATing
minus-squareBlackVenom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·22 days agoIPv6 is such an ugly monster.
minus-squarebfg9k@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·21 days agoIt just isn’t and I’m sick of people being scared of hexadecimals lol You can even spell stuff with them which is way easier to remember, my router’s ULA is fd13:dead:beef::1
minus-squareflubba86@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 days ago:cafe:babe: is another common one. Or :acdc:feed: .
minus-squarebfg9k@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 days agoThere was a burger joint we did IT for and we made their ULA fd14:dead:beef:cafe::1 I thought it was a bit clever
IPv4.
IPv6 became a recognized standard by 1998.
EDIT: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=ipv6-adoption
Nearly 30 years later, and less than half of the connections to Google are via IPv6.
Fucking NAT. Never should have been allowed to escape from the lab.
Lolol, you’re not wrong. NAT made IPv6 a later problem
I ❤️ IPv4
There’s no place like 127.0.0.1
There’s no place like
::1I can’t understand that gibberish, speak RFC 791 like a true patriot
I’m almost at the point where all of my connections are IPv6, but still hampered by my mobile provider (ironically, since IPv6 was generally adopted earlier on mobile in many countries).
Based on how ISPs seem to not get their CGNAT setups right, it’s not going away any time soon.
As a South African, I have never even seen IPv6. My university has two /16 blocks and no NATing
IPv6 is such an ugly monster.
It just isn’t and I’m sick of people being scared of hexadecimals lol
You can even spell stuff with them which is way easier to remember, my router’s ULA is fd13:dead:beef::1
:cafe:babe: is another common one. Or :acdc:feed: .
There was a burger joint we did IT for and we made their ULA fd14:dead:beef:cafe::1
I thought it was a bit clever