• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re aware that Nature is a multidisciplinary scientific journal, yes?

        If you’re insinuating that Nature is generally overtly political, you should really see someone to get that cranial-rectal inversion checked out.

        • demonsword@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          old twitter at least pretended to fight hate speech and disinformation, the “new” twitter X doesn’t give a flying fuck to both issues

    • ribboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not nearly this bad. Go read the article. It’s much easier to spread crap nowadays, even though you could before.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This isn’t pointed out enough, IMO. People act like it went sharply downhill under Musk but this is the platform that enabled extremists for years and only even banned Trump when he literally tried to overthrow democracy. Maybe Twitter was good in like 2010 but I really don’t think Musk changed THAT much about it.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s always been a cesspit of misinformation… Phony Stark is now merely advertising it as a feature.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Twitter’s influence has always been overstated by the media type, and the personalized recommendation algorithm it used has always been a black box to be gamed, and what this article really showed is that it is an inheritly unfair game and the people who writes the rules of the platform (in this case, Musk), can push whatever hot take they want to push to influence public opinion, and people who don’t have that level of access to Twitter will brute force follower with bots in the hopes that it’ll lure more real users to influence.

    So, dead internet theory and all, until we fully automate Twitter to bots influencing bots. There is no authenticity anymore, it’s all disinformation from all sides.

    Nowadays, I like to pretend that I never had a Twitter or Insta. Not a healthy way of coping, I know, but it’s way less stressful that way.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      To paraphrase Mitch “RIP” Hedburg: I’m a cesspool of disinformation. I used to be a cesspool of disinformation, but I’m still one, too.

  • hyperhopper@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t the mods say they were going to do something about musk/Twitter spam?

    This isn’t even about something Twitter did

    This isn’t even about something Twitter might do

    This is just a dude talking about what everybody knows about Twitter. And musk fans upvote anything Twitter, and musk haters upvote this out of a sense of validation that is shit.

    Voting is not good for this, please ban the musk spam

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Block it yourself. Block the words “elon” and “musk”. You won’t miss anything.

  • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I once read a quote that roughly translates as “Even the greatest wizard of all time can’t transform bread into bread”.

    I always thought it was stupid, but makes more sense now.