Quite the assumption.

Go learn what the term “assumption” means.

Because there was never anything communist about these states in any way whatsoever.

Communism is a state (as in a social, political and economic condition, not a government). None of these states ever reached this condition, and, therefore, was never communist. And, one could argue, that their development literally went the opposite way to what could be called communist with a straight face. As the anarchist Bakunin famously said, “the people’s boot is still a boot.”

This is why the Maoist-types call this shit “democratic centralism,” which is essentially just double-speak for “what the party says goes.”

This does not make the idea of communism invalid - but it’s still as perfectly vague as ever, unfortunately.

Where the fuck do you libs get your misinformation from?

That’s not where the term comes from.

Handguns are there because you lack the upper body strength to fight off an attacker.

That’s not what firearms are. They are killing tools. Plain and simple. Not “self-defence” tools. Killing tools. The US military does not provide it’s personel with firearms to “self-defend” themselves from rape.

4B stops no rapist.

How does a handgun stop a woman from marrying a rapist or ending up in a relationship with one?

Your understanding of the term “self-defence” isn’t based on reality.

Th 4B movement isn’t a political statement. At this point, it’s simply self-defense.

Practically/virtually no one believes the phrase “your body, my choice.”

It is “practically/virtually” the ideology of pro-rape right-wingers everywhere. Why the fuck do you think they spent so much effort to crush abortion rights?

I’d like to pet it with a .50 cal.

That works for me, too.

which is what’s known as Democracy

Just because it’s “known” as “democracy” because politicians and their crony media capitalists have been throwing the word around for a few centuries doesn’t actually make it democracy.

It’s never “small government” when it comes to funding pig.

Oh no!

Anyway…

Nah. They should just make sure the checks bounce.

They should send Alex Jones a $1 “royalty” check every month - just so that he doesn’t forget it.

You forget he also played Goldmember in the third movie.

Does the rich deserve credit for failing upward?

It’s easy to laugh at the right-wingers, but the truth is that this is the way power is measured by the patriarchy - control over other people’s bodies.

It doesn’t matter if this power is obtained through the use of laws, money or physical violence (it’s usually a combination of all three) - it’s the power that matters, and the patriarchy doesn’t care how it makes you look to the people you have that power over.

They’d better hope then that nothing bad happens to their precious military-industrial complex, then, eh?

You know, like losing their access to the imperial holdings that supplies it with cheap fuel, cheap resources and cheap labor?

That’s a rather silly thing to do - create an entire military-industrial complex to crush a mere “pipe dream.” That is, unless you are suggesting that they know perfectly well that it’s most definitely not a mere “pipe dream?”

It’s a pipe dream

Really? Is that why they’ve spent trillions throughout the last century on capitalist and fascist propaganda every year to convince you it’s just a “pipe dream?”

If we had the power to burn it down we would have burned it down hundred years ago.