• Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Would chess count?

    I mean chess is not not popular by any stretch of the mind, a lot of people around the world are playing it every single day and that won’t go away anytime soon, but I’m always surprised to see so much more excitement going on around a new version of This or That video game that people will play for a little while before switching to a newer version than for chess. Despite its apparent simplicity (and lack of visual effects), chess has remained a challenge for the smartest among us, and will keep on being so no matter how much better computers can be playing it.

    • FRYD@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      In my experience, chess is one of the more demoralizing games to try to get into. My friends are kinda into it and every time I play with them, it’s just 10 mins of slowly losing and every move I make feels pointless. You can learn the rules easily, but learning how to read the game state feels like a difficult and unrewarding process. I used to like chess casually, but playing with people who just have an amateur understanding isn’t fun and has made me less interested in the game.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Have you tried the demo for Passant?

      I’m the furthest away as anyone can be from a pro chess player, but this game really revived my passion for chess. Somehow all people want to play is blitz or tournaments. There’s little interest in variations. It’s like amongst the chess scene having fun became taboo. It’s a serious game for serious people who only want to defeat others. And it is so tiring. Oh look, another London system game, how titillating.

      It’s a board game, I know why people enjoy competition and all, but I find competition drains games from anything interesting to me. I just want it to be fun and intellectually stimulating. Bring variations and quirky rules back, make it interesting to lose. Level the playing field so we can all participate and have fun instead of everyone just trying to play optimally like little machines.

        • chunes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Someone should inform the devs there is no reason to pick anything but queen and knight.

              • msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Yeah, ‘google en passant’ is an r/AnarchyChess joke.

                Unless you are in on it, in which case damn, you’re stone cold.

                In theory, you can always promote to a rook just to show off. I have no idea if it’s considered a bad mannered move.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        But it has kings and queens and knights, armies of pawns and thick towers to defend them during merciless battles. It also has bishops, but I much prefer the French name: les fous aka the crazy ones ;)

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Chess has taken over a significant portion of my gaming time since getting into it a couple of years ago.

      It’s a beautifully deep game, and it’s refreshing to be able to pour time into something with staying power that people of every age play all over the world.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s a beautifully deep game, and it’s refreshing to be able to pour time into something with staying power that people of every age play all over the world.

        So much this :)