For context, I want to run a small personal gig (offering stuff on Patreon). Nothing too fancy.

In order to do that, I would need to use the Adobe suite, Windows, some audio and video effects, all requiring a commercial license.

In theory, I start to make money. How would Microsoft and Adobe know that I don’t pay for their software?

If I use some audio effects, how would their owners even be able to tell / find my work? We’re talking about basic sound effect, like rain, door knocks etc.

I’ve always been confused by this

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most of those use cases are untraceable.

    But there’s some things you shouldn’t pirate. I was a freelance developer for a company. They hired another set of freelancers who used stock photos and music, but didn’t have the proper licenses. Had legal papers sent their way.

    I learned about it because the company started demanding I provide all the proper licensing of my code and the libs I used. I have no idea what the details are or what happened. But they were pretty freaked out.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Adobe and Microsoft only kinda care about you. You’re one person. All the freelancers out there are still a fairly small part of their respective balance sheets. If you’re a freelance worker, some of your customers might require you to show valid licenses for the software you use, because they want to make sure their partners are ethical (at least, in this regard). Alternatively, you could use FOSS apps.

    As someone else already said, if you are making money using commercial software, you really should be paying for it. The cost of your software should be factored into what you charge your customers. They should understand that.

  • MuchPineapples@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just read about Solidworks. Don’t pirate that, it still contacts home and gives them all the info it can pull from your pc: ip, your name, company info, etc. and then they send you a huge bill for the costs of 5 years or so of licensing. Also don’t have an illegal copy next to a legal one, because then the legal one will detect the illegal one and send the info. Or open projects created with pirated software with a legal version.

    Of course this data snooping would be illegal in the EU, but outside that I would be careful.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Idgaf about pirating huge corpos stuff. Thats always moral. But don’t steal SFX and the like, theres just too much of it for free.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you earn/get big enough to care about it, then you would in the first place. Most software piracy busting methods revolves around existence of a snitch who knows you’re pirating. You definitely can get away with it if you’re just pirating it yourself, but a corporation with like 100 workers cannot do it when all it takes is one person to get busted.

    On sound effects / samples it depends on how many people see it, so you don’t need to worry too much unless you get popular similarly.

  • Sheik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For assets, you would be distributing other people’s work without permission. Some companies scan online content for digital fingerprints of copyrighted material. Think Youtube content ID but they are other tools out there.

    As for software you used without a license, the work you did doesn’t matter in that regard, you’re only liable for using unlicensed software by bypassing copyright protection methods. You’re not distributing it. Their DRM (even cracked) might send them enough identifiable information to sue you (in theory).

  • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Adobe genuine service I guess. Use something like simplewall or postmaster to block them from accessing the internet or block them via the built-in firewall.

    Edit: Giving away exported content is fine but be careful with the project files. They can’t figure out in what software and image or video was made in as long as you check the metadata. But project files can probably give you away.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In general they wont. The way they usually find out with small businesses is disgruntled former employees snitching (some actually offer a reward for this).

    • cestvrai@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know about Adobe but I think it’s true for some software.

      My previous employer (~30 person company) got in trouble for a Fusion360 file that was sent to a customer after being edited by an intern’s pirated copy. Employees and interns typically used a different licensed CAD software.

      I think the pirated file being opened at a larger company tipped them off, but I don’t know how they ultimately tracked us down.

      That being said, I personally wouldn’t want the stress of using pirated software, let alone pirated assets in a professional setting.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Adobe lists it on their support website that serial numbers get put into files and there’s even a little tool to check if your serial number registered properly so you can make sure to claim the rights to your own work.

        I definitely wouldn’t want to risk it unless you passed the files through some intermediary programs that stripped that kind of metadata out.

  • NoiseColor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been working on a computer with pirated software for almost two decades. Graphic design, video,… There is no way anyone could know our care.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Instead of Photoshop, use GIMP. Instead of Premiere, use Da Vinci Resolve. Instead of After Effects, use Blender. Instead of Audtion, use Audacity.

    • thorbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Instead of answering their question, tell them something completely different from what they asked.

      • silverbax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        On top of giving poor recommendations. Nobody who uses Photoshop and GIMP professionally would think GIMP is a suitable replacement for Photoshop.

        • thorbot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          For real. GIMP is trash if you are well established in photoshop automations and workspaces.