Full title: Ubisoft says you “cannot complain” it shut down The Crew because you never actually owned it, and you weren’t “deceived” by the lack of an offline version “to access a decade-old, discontinued video game”

Ubisoft’s lawyers have responded to a class action lawsuit over the shutdown of The Crew, arguing that it was always clear that you didn’t own the game and calling for a dismissal of the case outright.

The class action was filed in November 2024, and Ubisoft’s response came in February 2025, though it’s only come to the public’s attention now courtesy of Polygon. The full response from Ubisoft attorney Steven A. Marenberg picks apart the claims of plaintiffs Matthew Cassell and Alan Liu piece by piece, but the most common refrain is that The Crew’s box made clear both that the game required an internet connection and that Ubisoft retained the right to revoke access “to one or more specific online features” with a 30-day notice at its own discretion.

  • ihatefascist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Give it another 5 years and Ubisoft will be dead, what was the last Ubisoft game without controversy/bad gameplay? I gotta go back 10 years or so

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown was well received.

      Their “AAAA” output is pure slop, but the smaller games can be OK.

        • Suite404@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          I always assumed they were shit since they’re the only Nintendo branded games that go on sale for more than 10% off without a bundle.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 days ago

            I think it’s only Nintendo published games that basically never go on sale.

            Rabbids is unusual because it’s got Mario in but it’s not by Nintendo.

            Their whole policy on never having a sale makes me not want a Switch 2 at all.

          • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            They’re actually really nice, well-made X-COM lites. Great if you don’t want to immediately throw your kids to the Chryssalids.

            Rabbids still kinda suck as a concept, but the games are good enough that I can look past it

          • slimerancher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Nah, they are published by Ubisoft, so they go on regular ubisoft style sales. They are pretty good games though. I haven’t played the second one yet, but first one was really well made and polished game.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It’s such a shame that game didn’t get lore attention. It’s one of the best metroidvanias I’ve ever played and has amazing combat.

        Edit: Talking about Prince of Persia Lost Crowns, the Mario rabbids game was also fun but not as good.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        without controversy

        Anno 1800 was an Epic exclusive (and Ubisoft’s Uplay) for a year on release. It was available for pre order on Steam. I believe people that bought it on Steam prior to the one year exclusivity deal still got it. It was a whole thing though. Definitely would call it a controversy.