• Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I agree with this, as long as lines are drawn at the kind of conspiracy theories of “homosexuality is a mental illness”, and the like. I want to make a point that this would pertain to memes as well.

      This is the time to draw clear lines, because we are deciding the tone/direction of one of the largest instance in Lemmy.

      With the timing being suspiciously close to Meta’s clearly bigoted “relaxation” of the mod rules, this brings with it a bad feel, but let’s remember, the fediverse is just growing and taking shape, so this was inevitable (and many of us have been watching it unfold). But we have to remember that we shape it, unlike the corporate shit we left. Make your voices heard.

      Edit:

      I agree with this, as long as lines are drawn at the kind of conspiracy theories of “migrants are ruining our country homosexuality is a mental illness”, and the like. I want to make a point that this would pertain to memes as well.

      I made this change because I believe banning things that are subjective quashes debate.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      What I understand is the new rules are to force us to deal with random nonsense conspiracy theories. We are encouraged to have drawn out discussions with concern trolls who should just get banned. Do you have any idea how long a troll can draw out a discussion while still remaining polite? It’s fun for them to make us patiently explain to them that the Earth is round.

        • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You also have the option to not react to people you believe is trolling in bad faith, and report them if you feel they are brewing the rules.

          Leaving more power in the user’s control- you decide a user is a troll and the mods don’t see it that way, you block them and anyone who does want to see them has the option.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It sounds like it means users are forced to interact with shitty content because the mods won’t remove it.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              The admins demand that stupid conspiracy theories be allowed a platform. They shouldn’t be. They make the user experience worse. No one wants to deal with annoying nonsense from morons, it makes dissensions a drag. This is a growth-at-all-costs move by the admins which is only going to make .world worse. And for what? Who does this help? Certainly not normal users who don’t want to listen to conspiracy theories or have them pollute their feeds.

              I’m trying to be polite to the admins because evidently they care more about that then the user experience, but this is a terrible move and will not help .world at all and I have absolutely no idea why you’re defending it.