Yeah… this isn’t a meme, it’s literally children being sold.
As I recall it, the family were facing eviction, and the kids were indeed sold, including the one she was pregnant with. A couple of them ended up basically being slaves on a farm somewhere.
I’ll laugh at plenty of things I probably shouldn’t but this isn’t one of them.
My grandfather was sold into what amounted to slavery during this time period under similar circumstances. Many of these children were treated with incredible cruelty, then grew up and were shipped off to war. Mostly voluntarily, given that war was actually a quality of life improvement where they got perks like socks and food.
The consequence of edgy “ha ha slavery funny” humor. This is why punching down is never ok.
I must be misunderstanding, are you suggesting this lady sold her kids because of bad jokes?
Or what is the consequence you’re talking about? The consequence of dark humour is seeing dark humour?
You saw this as hilarious rather than horrifying.
Well, I saw an opportunity to make a joke about the cost of housing.
I don’t think it was hilarious but I chuckled and thought to contribute to our content desperate platform.
But yeah, I do like my humour dark.
People don’t have to like it. Again, don’t punch down it can have disastrous consequences for people who really don’t need it.
I’m genuinely struggling to think of a non ridiculous chain of events that leads to disastrous consequences here.
Keep wondering then. ✌️
Feel free to contribute whatever you’d like to see to the community!
deleted by creator
Whatever works for you!
This is not a meme, but a reminder of a terrible time and this particular event. Post it in a history community, but not here. Why would we find something so sad funny?
It is in bad taste. To say the least.
Yup, I messed up and didn’t realize some folks wouldn’t read the caption below.
Next time I’ll have the caption included in the picture so as to avoid confusion.
The caption is there. But that doesn’t even matter. That isn’t the point. Point is the attitude towards the image, what it stands for and that it shouldn’t be used like this.
Using images of people suffering to make fun of a current situation is insensitive and disrespectful to the people who were suffering at the time. It also trivializes the situation and makes light of something that is serious and important. Essentially it isn’t ethical to use an image like this to make a point like yours.
It’s similar to someone posting a picture of a starving child and captioning it with “how I feel when I’m on diet.” It’s inappropriate, disrespectful and offensive.
Frankly, this post should be deleted for the same reasons.
Despite the rustled jimmies in this thread, I don’t really care what people post in a fucking ‘memes’ channel. However, you should know the caption does show up in sync and doesn’t make it any better. This might help clear things up:
I guess OP just had a glitch or some other bug.
I don’t see a caption on Sync.
Interesting! Does Sync usually not display captions/titles of posts?
It has the title but if you had some other text it doesn’t show up.
It doesn’t show up in Boost for Lemmy on Android either.
Must depend on appearance settings. I’m using boost on Android as well and I saw the title
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
This is real right?
Yes. Here’s a link to the Wikimedia page of the photograph.
The picture was taken August 5, 1948, for The Vidette-Messenger.
Yeah, old photo from (I think) the great depression.
This is an incredibly sad picture
Dawg this is not a meme what the fuck
She should use the subscription model to get money for them every month.
Renting children? What a horrible idea- Oh wait, no. The Simpsons already did that
More garbage for the dumpster fire. But those upvotes are just so important…
?
I wish I could go back in time, “buy” those kids and raise them in safety and comfort. This is not an okay “joke” OP, and I see people are finally starting to realize what I realized in 2017 after watching that shitty movie “Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children” that literally drove me to insanity.
A lot of people don’t care about children, instead seeing them purely as a burden unless the child is forced to work. It’s disgusting and rooted entirely in overly conservative values.
Many who don’t fit into the above category are simply sexist and hate kids as being the result of either “being a traitor to your gender” (if you’re female) or “pussy whipped” (if you’re male).
This seems to have been the majority view since at least 2015, though I only noticed it when I realised children were being cast exclusively as villains, victims of the villains, or heroes who are forced to “grow up” over the course of the story. If proof is needed, I can provide a list of not one, not two, not three, but 33 different stories that do this and almost all of them are either made in the 2010s or became popular in some way in the 2010s.
deleted by creator
It feels like lemmy users are too shy because of reddit popularity.
I see you’ve never heard of the 90%/9%/1% rule of social media users.
90% are lurkers. 9% are intermittent posters. 1% are heavy use posters.
It’s not that people are shy, it’s that literally with a fraction of the userbase Reddit has, that 10% that actually makes posts is just a smaller number of people.
wat.jpg
