Title is somewhat misleading. It’s not for anything video-related. It’s for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

  • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most people use the service for perfectly legitimate purposes. On the fringes, however, some users abuse the software to share pirate libraries publicly, a considerable thorn in the side for rightsholders.

    I’ve been using it for over a decade and I don’t know single person that uses it for “perfectly legitimate purposes” (assuming they mean "not for pirated content, considering the next sentence). There’s no reason to use Plex as a front end for all other streaming services.

    • Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it doesn’t matter your experience. You need to accept everyone is innocent unless you can prove it. So… To bad

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You need to accept everyone is innocent unless you can prove it. So… To bad

        What? I’m not a lawyer out to get people, I’m just saying that the majority of their userbase is most likely playing pirated material.

        • Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And I’m saying you can’t prove that, so it doesn’t matter. It’s just a guess. A good one in my opinion, but nothing else.