First thought as well 😂

In seconds? I get 363.61 days doing that.

Crocs

Oh wow, I obviously didn’t read the article. Shame on me. Had no idea they had that few on staff.

From what I’ve read about their Daily Active Users they’re going to be overstaffed soon. No hate but they exploded and when things settle they might not need as much staff. Thoughts?

Sad, he probably would’ve broken 2 hours.

Imagine a crime free Gotham. Living in fear not of a Batman that caused physical harm when he catches you breaking the law, but he does follow you around peeing on you until he finds another crook.

He was going to piss down the shower drain rather than use the litter box.

No good point, I appreciate discussions!

I think they know if it didn’t exempt city residents there would be enough backlash from eligible voters it wouldn’t pass. Seeing as it’s a fine and not a ban it can have secondary effects of improving safety and the environment but primarily it will raise money.

Well they also exempt taxis and city residents so it’s not about safety or the environment it’s about the money.

I’ve now read the law since someone above found and posted it. Terrible journalism not posting it. The law does state vaginal means contact between a penis and vagina.

https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2023/S3161

Or genital contact, covers everyone right?

This law is supposed to reduce ambiguity, why wouldn’t they just state genital contact to reduce the grey area further? With this new law someone could argue that the vagina owner is consenting so it isn’t rape.

If it’s a code brown and the mens/womens room is closed who wouldn’t use the other bathroom?

Wonder why they didn’t invite Italy this time? 😂

That’s their point.

How do I sub to that? It says view on lemmy.world but won’t let me switch over.

I think strategically the best thing the feds could do is back off for two weeks. Does anyone believe these convoys have enough supplies to keep for more than 48 hours?

Failing that keep this up until November. We know these guys won’t mail in ballot.

It also depends on the context and the purpose of the survey. With a sample size of n=1000, you can get a general sense of the population’s opinions or characteristics if the sample is representative of the population and the survey is well-designed. However, larger sample sizes may be needed if you want to make inferences with more precision or if your population is very diverse, or if you want to drill into sub-segments within the population that may be niche and hard to reach (e.g., minority ethnic groups).

In that article. I am saying religious groups have niche minorities similar to minority ethnic groups.

I said for religious selection 3,300 is too small a sample size. Their previous studies show they have much larger sample sizes for religious diversity. There’s over 4k religions in the world and while those aren’t all represented in the US I think the sample size should exceed the possible variety.