Disabling a systemd service won’t prevent it from starting. For example, if another service depends on it then it will start anyway.
You have to mask the service which redirects the service files to /dev/null so that the service effectively has zero directives.
systemctl mask --now snapd
It also means that anything which depends on snapd will likely fail. That is absolutely an improvement since we obviously don’t want anything that depends on snaps.
I was running Fedora. Something like 27 or so. I needed drivers. I don’t remember if it was AMD or Nvidia, but they were only available on RedHat.
So I downloaded the RedHat drivers for the GPU and forced it to install. It worked! It was great.
Then when I updated the distro to the next release… everything failed. It was dropping into grub, but no video was output. Ooof.
So I ended up enabling a terminal console and connecting to it via a serial port to debug. I had to completely uninstall that RPM and I was never happy that it was properly gone. So a few months later I ended up reinstalling the whole OS.
On the plus side, I learned a lot about grub and serial consoles. Worth it.
tastes good
Sir, let’s discuss the taste of water.
My sister tells me water is tasteless. I disagree. Water definitely has a taste. I have yet to find water with a taste I like except when I am very dehydrated.
Tap water? Definitely no. Filtered water? Nope. Mineral water? Nah. Flavored water? Eugh.
Tea, though. Tea is amazing. Especially coffee tea. Coffee tea is amazing. You take coffee beans, grind them up, and pass hot water through it. It’s so amazing.
First: Don’t take financial advice from randos on the internet
Just a conversation, man :)
I didn’t even know someone could borrow against securities. Sounds like I need to have a discussion with my finance guy…
… speaking of finance guys, I should find one.
A million dollars is a number we need to have a conversation about in this country, because everyone wants to hate on millionaires.
Sure, let’s talk about that.
People who hate on millionaires are making arguments a million hours too late (for many of the reasons you stated). The rage these days is to hate on billionaires.
You have zero cash plus a property asset. The value of that asset will grow as well.
Well okay I did ask about buying a fancy house so I think it’s a reasonable assumption.
But I want to change the argument move the goalpost. Let’s suppose I bought a fancy house and the housing market bubble finally burst… and that the house is now worth 1/3 of what I bought it for. That loss of value caused a massive heart attack and definitely caused death.
Or let’s say I spent the money on hookers and blow. Might as well go out with a bang, after all.
Now all of that value truly is gone. Sucks to be my kids I guess. But at least I had a fun time, right?
You’re trying to tell me that borrowing against securities solves the problem. But it only moves the problem.
If I borrow against the securities, I get cash. I use that cash. I now have zero cash (again). Then I die a horribly quiet death with megabucks owed for loans against the securities. The estate does not have cash to pay back those loans. You’re saying those securities would be sold… for more profit than what I borrowed against? Then it sounds like I didn’t borrow against their full value. And if I did borrow against their full value, then the loan cannot be paid back because the cash is spent.
Borrow against the value of the securities, obviously
Yeah, borrow against the value of the securities!
Who will pay the debt when I die? My children via the estate? My children via the bank’s increasingly higher fees? My children via taxpayer-funded loan “forgiveness”? Sounds like a Bernie Madoff scheme to me. Best keep my money under the mattress.
Retirees should be living off of dividends, 401ks and IRAs, not volatile stock sell offs.
If you’re only going to live another 10 or 20 years but you have $1M stashed… do you take the $1M now and buy a fancy house? Or do you keep that $1M going for the… checks math … few tens of thousands of dollars it’ll earn in yearly dividends? Meanwhile your daughter needs a new hair-do, your son is living in your basement again, and your wife… well she’s your wife. And she wants that new car that you promised you’d get her when you retire.
I guess it’s back to the grind instead.
Yes, schools are businesses these days. Businesses don’t want to actually do effort to get consent.
deleted by creator
That sounds like a great plan. Unfortunately I think it’s ill-conceived.
To demonstrate, I’d like you to take this survey: https://novehiclesinthepark.com/
Then read up on some of the discussions from the time https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36453856
Rules can be interpreted in many ways and your rules of porn/nsfl/nsfw might not conform to other peoples’ rules of porn/nsfl/nsfw. It’s not exactly an easy problem to solve.
You might be surprised to learn that multiple distros have control panel equivalent of driver managers and event logs.
Yes, you’re right.
And so non-competes should indeed be banned.