Last release wad 25 days ago

Available as flatpak https://flathub.org/apps/io.neovim.nvim

Finally I underdtand to whom I talk, thx

Hmm? You lose the namespace isolation, and by extension the chroot, but that’s it. It’s definitely nice to have, but to say it’s “most” of the sandboxing seems a misrepresentation. Note that some distros disable the kernel support for them by default, so that’s what they currently get regardless of Flatpak.

To firefox it doesn’t seem to be too bad.

On nautilus you can’t even click the address bar. On dolphin it still works as you say.

I didn’t even realize this until you wrote it down. That is bad. It’s the same on mobile. Consistent behavior is good. At first you select the box and then write into it. It’s good that it selects everything, otherwise you would have to select everything in order to be able to use it as the search box. It would be very annoying if it were differently.

That leads me to the question: why aren’t we using the path box to search stuff like on browsers? Dolphin even opens firefox and searches for “http://test” when I type just “test” into it. Why is http the default protocol?

Because the Firefox browser is open-source, we know Firefox inside and out

Ok

Tip: you will still need to restart Firefox for the latest version.

That shows who the target group is

1. To state that firefox is fully compatible with flatpak is great! That is a reason to use the flatpak version of it.
2. Nice
3. It’s nice to see better performance but you could’ve just told distro maintainers what to do
4. Updates are fast even if you use the flatpak or distro build.

I use firefox btw

Edit: I compeltely forgot that ubuntu replaced firefox with the snap version. Is this the reason why they do it?

And, I don’t like that ubuntu replaced the distro firefox with snap but at the same time I don’t like that fedora still sticks with the distro firefox and not the flatpak version on atomics. I am nuts.

Edit2: I am not nuts! Ubuntu let’s you believe you install the apt version of firefox. Fedora shall replsce firefox with flatpak but it shall not pretend that it’s installed via rpm-ostree / dnf.

You can save up to 77% if you buy now.

you can never save by buying something. I save if I don’t buy.

I’d never use absolute paths unless it is a file that will always be there, e.g. system files, icons, etc.

1. why

Carrot and stick - no loss.

Stop watching this crap

Thanks for showing me what the block button is for

I haven’t seen 1 star trek meme

Ripping childrens audiobooks from youtube with ylt-dlp is my least favorite because uploaders upload trash a lot, i.e. they let it repeat two times or even more often within one video.

I prefer subscribing to podcasts and downloading audiobooks via the usual means. There’s also good stuff on deezer which is very convenient.

No, you’re right but people keep saying that space is a concern when thinking about flatpak. This article clearly shows that that’s not an issue.

even on a 64GB (space, not RAM) machine, I would use a flatpak centric installation. The 1GB difference isn’t really that important, imo.

I’ve never done it but at boot you should be able to choose from which drive you’d like to boot. You’ve got two drives and a usb stick with arch. Leave microsoft alone (remove, if you are afraid, and it’s ok to be afraid. Once, I did overwrite something important) and boot from usb and select the other drive when installing the OS. Then you should’ve arch installed.

Then, you boot your computer and select the drive from which you’d like to boot (arch). Set the arch drive as your default drive that auto boots after x seconds

Good luck on your arch journey and take time to understand everything 💪🏻

Op tried manjaro, not arch. Endeavouros is arch. Manjaro is superfluOS.

So, I should not look into enabling hardware acceleration?

Initially I wanted to include the app as well but somehow I didn’t. If facebook would open its source code for the app, it doesn’t mean that you could build it and use it that way without additional keys and facebook wouldn’t want that which would mean they still publish an app you don’t know the exact source code of.