I’m with you. Both that I enjoyed the movie and don’t understand the point this guy trying to make.

Could you recommend any reading about the Yakuza involvement in the industry? Super fascinating but it’s the first I’ve heard if it

Thanks

And that sentiment, writ across the country, handed the election on a platter to the Republican party. Who will be arguably worse for Palestine that the Democrats.

Ultimately none of the Uncommitted arguments are wrong - I would go so far to say they are reasonable - but they presume that the alternative is better than the incumbent. Which I believe is manifestly misplaced in the 2024 election. All well and good to withhold support because you’ve been ignored, but this is a prime example of cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Anyway. I respect that you’re clarifying and I appreciate that.

I will apologise for my aggressive response. I conflated your position with direct support for the underlying. That was a mistake and I apologize.

Re the ‘punish’ comment, I remain completely disgusted with Uncommitted due to their stated goals ’ a protest campaign aimed mainly to pressure Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to achieve a ceasefire in the Israel–Hamas war and impose an arms embargo on Israel’

No such political pressure towards the Trump campaign? I recognize that he isn’t the sitting president but even a casual observer can see that his presidency would likely be significantly worse for Palestine.

However, re third party or ‘none of the above’ voters, including any teamsters that did not vote for Harris because she didn’t beg, fuck em. I believe their fence sitting (at least partially) enabled this right wing smorgasbord.

No. And fuck you for taking that position. That Uncommitted position doesn’t ‘punish’ Harris, it simply ensures that a demagogue would be elected. AND just coincidentally, the early actions of that demagogue signals that Palestine simply won’t exist in any significant fashion in a few years.

The direct result of your holier-than-thou’ position is that Palestine gets fucked 10 times harder. Good job asshole.

Appreciate the comment, unfortunately my employer has limited access to O365 apps. I have a slightly different use case than OP

A followup question, if you don’t mind. I am running stock android 14 on a pixel 6. My main user account is my personal (nothing work related), and a second user account is my work profile, complete with phone-management software. The two accounts are based upon different Google accounts.

If my work were to remote wipe, I have assumed that would only affect the (second) user profile which has those apps, and not the main user account.

Do you know if that is correct?

This is great context, thanks.

A followup question, if you don’t mind. I am running stock android 14, which offers multiple users. My main user account is my personal (nothing work related), and a second user account is my work profile, complete with phone-management software. The two accounts are based upon different Google accounts.

If my work were to remote wipe, I have assumed that would only affect the (second) user profile which has those apps, and not the main user account.

Do you know if that is correct?

Agree with all your points. I just wanted to remind people to hate the architect (in this case politicians and insurers), not just the coder.

Alright team, I’m bringing the opposite opinion to this thread. Bring your pitchforks.

Two things :

1. Hanlon’s razor. Consultants are not mensa candidates. They are ordinary people who sometimes do a shit job.

2. Complexity. Each state has its own wildly complex eligibility and availability rules. Each insurer within each state, equally so. As much as this article shits on Deloitte for having 20+ state contracts, that doesn’t mean 1 common platform / common solution. People within the fediverse - being somewhat more tech inclined - should have some empathy for this

I hate Deloitte as much as the next guy, but why no hatred for the politicians (or special interest groups comprised of insurers) that wrote opaque state-based legislation? Speaking of insurers, why no hate for them? Whether private or public - they literally have a vested interest in denying coverage…

If we are going to throw stones, let’s find the right villain.

Thanks for this different perspective. Makes the grind more tolerable