psychological warfare is legal.
I find them online and use javascript to rip them into a text file and use @Voice premium on android to read/listen to the text files. I got the premium @Voice because I didn’t realize how much of a staple having an app that can read most types of files was going to be.
Meng Hao, I Shall Seal the Heavens.
If you just
Yeah that’s the one that gets me. People use it to say something without having to commit to having said it and/or attempt to reduce the weight of an action. Just make more money, just work harder, just work faster, just don’t worry about it, just calm down. Pretty much minimizes the context the person they’re talking to comes from like whatever they’re suggesting is so easy no one should have to think about it.
“Just don’t use the word just!” lol
Using it as a shortening for justice doesn’t bother me for some reason xD
“just” was meant to indicate a recent position in time. As in “just now.”
Even a pencil can be used as a weapon if you’re clever ;) but I try to refrain from telling other people how to live their lives.
unpopular hexbear because seeing both sides of the propaganda broadens my critical thinking more than echo chambers, yes-men, and logical fallacies being thrown my way instead of supporting data
Absolutely, we might have to deal with the sheer terror of alternative viewpoints. It’s like wearing a raincoat in the desert – better safe than sorry, right?"
Starting with the word ‘honestly.’ We were already expecting you to be honest, reiterating it only adds suspicion that what follows isn’t honest.
In One Piece the main characters name is Luffy.
The default response I get most of the time I comment on things is along the lines of “You shouldn’t have thoughts or opinions and because you shared them I’m going to get as many other users to attack you as possible.”
Thought this might be different considering the context of this post, but here we are. You’re getting downvoted as much as you are upvoted for pointing out that someone is trying to manipulate the context to attack me. No responses either because if they aren’t actually bots they seem to have trouble coming up with any kind of understandable explanation for their behavior.
It’s like being in traffic and getting flicked off by the person that cut you off… when there was no one behind you…
Is ‘your’ interpretation of things the only one that exists?
is just
My favorite response for this is ‘point to your mind.’
My mean response is ‘[email protected] is just a random user name with some words attached and no person actually exists behind it.’
Another response could be “A car is just some wheels and an engine.”
Sure would be fun to watch someone try and drive some wheels and an engine.
It’s not dying, it just suffers from the mentality of “we’re preemptively using our ‘last resort’ of defederating from a community because we think they might possibly cause some kind of problem, maybe, but we don’t want to even give them that chance.” Maybe make an account on a less confused instance. You might just be getting nannied harder than you want.
He would have never guessed that I was at lemmy.world first. lol, probably would have broke his brainwashing to acknowledge another user as a human being he would have to consider the opinion of. Just pretend everyone’s out to get you for reasons other people made up for you. Back to sleep little one.
No need to waste energy making a real point then, lol people here just make shit up and then posture as if it makes them right somehow. Look, I’m doing it! No need to actually have any basis for my opinion that no one asked for! :D damn Armok: God of Blood HOW DID I NOT THINK OF THIS BEFORE!?! Lol wait, accidentally asked you to think critically. lol. My bad, carry on.
What chain of logic lead you to that conclusion?
Yep, when I get sick of the rhetoric here I just jump over to hexbear where they make fun of the people I tend to disagree with frequently here. . I think the best moderation tools would be to attempt to decentralize it so the petty tyrants the role seems to attract can’t abuse their authority to censor opinions they don’t agree with regardless of whether or not the content actually conflicts with the rules.
CBS News/YouGov poll
.> is skeptical of how many Trump supporters would take a CBS News poll…
Isn’t it interesting that it’s taught as supply and demand, and not demand and supply?