That feels like it should violate the license
That feels like it should violate the license
Somehow it feels like this whole essay could be summarized in a single paragraph of, say, 3 proper sentences
Wasn’t STEAM supposed to be something specific, not a replacement of STEM? Idk, I just know the acronym because Angela Collier did a video.
The original had a sheep instead of Garfield
Essentially corporate censorship for fear of maybe offending someone.
and people will blame the wokes/DEI/whatever
Wasn’t the joke that Chang was in fact doing blackface, and everyone else scolds him for it? (this doesn’t make it good to remove, just changes the context)
Computer science: pi is O(1)
So much in this beautiful equation
Any maths joke of this type will have obvious holes in it, that’s just how maths works
In that case, there’s no need to specify anything about the angles. Or, the characterisation the meme is playing with: a shape with four straight sides of equal length and right angles. Adding parallel to the meme’s version doesn’t help.
I’m just tired of this thread. Not only do Lemmy users have this weird urge to show off their high school maths knowledge to dunk on a joke that obviously only works because OP played with the definition, but they’re not even correct. The /r/mathmemes thread was much better.
Canon differential geometer hair
No it doesn’t. Right angles + equal length is a sufficient condition
I suddenly understand the Simpsons joke. Cool track.
it’s AI
Looks a lot larger than A1 tbh
Some places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive
Positive integers are (a subset of) natural numbers
Or you could ask that one friend