weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoBig naturals is way easier to pronouncesub.wetshaving.socialexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1external-linkBig naturals is way easier to pronouncesub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squareewenak@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoWell what I learned in school was that zero was both positive and negative. I knew some people consider the natural numbers don’t include zero, but I didn’t know for some zero isn’t even positive.
minus-squareSchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 days agoit is neither positive nor negative
minus-squaredeltapi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 days agoI knew a physicist who considered 0 negative if she arrived at 0 coming from negative source numbers and positive if coming from positive sources. Something something sampling rate
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoSome places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive
Well what I learned in school was that zero was both positive and negative. I knew some people consider the natural numbers don’t include zero, but I didn’t know for some zero isn’t even positive.
it is neither positive nor negative
I knew a physicist who considered 0 negative if she arrived at 0 coming from negative source numbers and positive if coming from positive sources.
Something something sampling rate
Some places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive