Slashdot Summary

An international research team has for the first time imaged and controlled a type of magnetic flow called altermagnetism, which physicists say could be used to develop faster and more reliable electronic devices. Financial Times:

A groundbreaking experiment at a powerful X-ray microscope in Sweden provides direct proof of the existence of altermagnetism, according to a paper published in Nature on Wednesday. Altermagnetic materials can sustain magnetic activity without themselves being magnetic.

The team from the UK’s Nottingham university that led the research said the discovery has revolutionary potential for the electronics industry. “Altermagnets have the potential to lead to a thousand-fold increase in the speed of microelectronic components and digital memory, while being more robust and energy-efficient,” said senior author Peter Wadley, Royal Society research fellow at Nottingham.

Hard disks and other components underpinning the modern computers industry process data in ferromagnetic materials, whose intrinsic magnetism limits their speed and packing density. Using altermagnetic materials will allow current to flow in non-magnetic products.


Archived at https://archive.ph/Fk7xv

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, it seems like it’s got quite a bit of potential (even though I only understand the broadest strokes of it). Unfortunately, it’ll probably be a while before we see actual/practical applications since we’re only at the “proving it exists” phase.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, one of the researchers said 10-ish years. Which is fast for new tech but slow for life.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I don’t know how I missed the mention of 10 years, but thanks. At least they have some kind of ballpark estimate. As with most new battery tech announcements, I’m not going to hold my breath, lol.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            And it sounds like it’s not just batteries. This has applications for memory and data storage (though I’m just parroting what they said). We’ll see what happens in the next decade or two!

            • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 hours ago

              My bad, I phrased that poorly. I meant it like when new battery technology is announced, it seems like nothing ever comes of it.

              • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                It’s because it goes from tiny bespoke samples for testing, then confirm it’s actually what scientists actually think is happening, then R&D to scale up, then figuring out how to make it profitable. After all that work, if it’s not profitable, it doesn’t get made.

                Just remember those old gen rechargeable double A batteries. After like 3 to 6 months they wouldn’t charge well and you constantly had to switch batteries after half a day.

                Like these:

                Now we just buy new phones when the battery doesn’t last as long. That’s all in about 20 years. This stuff is exciting but I also wish shit was faster just to see it in my lifetime.

                Can’t wait to be growing vegetables with an automated system powered by solar power and my loyal robotic attack dog/pack mule.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yes. Researcher said 10 years (probably at the earliest), but I’m more of an “at all” kind of person. I like celebrating scientific achievements for their own sake, because it’s something we humans figured out.