Puberty blockers for under-18s with gender dysphoria will be banned indefinitely across the UK except for use in clinical trials, the government has announced.

Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said that after receiving advice from medical experts, he would make existing emergency measures banning the sale and supply of puberty blockers indefinite.

The Department of Health and Social Care said the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) had published independent expert advice that there was “currently an unacceptable safety risk in the continued prescription of puberty blockers to children”.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    These monsters just hate trans kids so much. TERF island strikes again.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Unacceptable safety risk in trans kids feeling comfortable with who they are as human beings.

  • n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Puberty blockers to be banned indefinitely for under-18s with gender dysphoria across UK

    I fixed the title. Of course, they’re still available for other medical conditions, they’re just singling out gender dysphoria.

  • dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    So puberty blockers are not legal until puberty is over? Makes complete sense /s

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I don’t know about the issue enough for me to comment on if she is biased or not, but I found this NYT interview (archive.org link) and she really seems to try to be playing both sides to me. Her main arguement seems to be don’t treat this as an issue to resolve gender, that makes you ignore mental health/depression/other things, but with there not being the best care of that nature available for trans individuals, what avenue is left for them?

      It sounds like she wants to go on about a lack of enough proof for her to stop treatment, but it also doesn’t sound like she has enough proof to say it’s harmful, but that doesn’t seem to discourage her helping eliminate it.

      • TOModera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Credentials sure, but Cass has also been found to follow anti Trans groups, threw out any positive study that wasn’t blind (which would have been unethical to run) and the report itself was influenced by a similar report originally done in Florida under Ron DeSantis. This is a biased report that started with a conclusion and ignored any evidence that disagreed.

          • nfh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            The report exists, but it has so many errors, misinterpreting its own data to bend to the conclusions its authors decided they wanted to find, lots of cherry picking, and ignoring any fact inconvenient to its conclusions.

            Imagine a paper that concludes that dowsing or homeopathy is good science. It’s about that accurate.

            • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Also it was commissioned by the Tories, to be done by a woman who before even starting her research for the report, was clearly biased against trans people.

            • n2burns@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              K…I started my original comment with, “While I don’t agree with it’s findings,” and was responding to a comment asking for elaboration on the safety risks. I was just providing context, not stating the report was gospel-truth or anything.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      think

      I’m gonna stop you right there, no useful thought process was involved here at all.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      How is denying scientifically proven medical care “common sense”?

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Because kids under the age of 18 shouldn’t be allowed to use these types of medications. I just don’t think we’re fully aware of the consequences at that age. I mean, I did a ton of stupid shit when I was a kid… didn’t we all? I look back and think, WTF was I thinking?

        EDIT: my comment that was removed literally said “common sense”. Y’all getting worse than Reddit…

        • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          I just don’t think we’re fully aware of the consequences at that age.

          It gives “We just don’t know if 5G is dangerous and unhealthy!!!”

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Are the unknown consequences more or less severe than depression, self-harm, and suicide?

  • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) had published independent expert advice that there was “currently an unacceptable safety risk in the continued prescription of puberty blockers to children”.

    Wait, that means Trump was right?