A jury has found a delivery driver not guilty in the shooting of a YouTube prankster who was following him around a mall food court earlier this year

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know everyone loves when YouTube pranksters get whats coming but shooting someone over a mild annoyance is never a good thing. This is why america seems fucking nuts to anyone that doesn’t live there.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Somebody approaching you, even though you’re trying to move away and telling them to stop, is not a “mild annoyance”. It’s dangerous because weapons are so freely available. It would be better if they weren’t, but while they are, you shouldn’t do something like this.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not enough to shoot someone in any civilised country.

        It’s important to realize that the confrontation lasted 30 seconds. That’s the amount of time he waited before almost killing someone.

        He wasn’t being chased in a dark alley or stalked for half a hour, someone played loud noises in his face and it took a total of 30 seconds for him to decide to shoot someone over it. Literally insane.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is in a civilized country where you have to assume everyone has a gun.

          It’s important to realize that the confrontation lasted 30 seconds. That’s the amount of time he waited before almost killing someone.

          Yes, I do realise that, and I did realise it when I wrote my initial comment. What is your point? That someone can’t become dangerous towards you if your interaction lasts 30 seconds or less?

          He wasn’t being chased in a dark alley and stalked for half a hour, someone played loud noises in his face and it took a total of 30 seconds for him to decide to shoot someone over it. Literally insane.

          See, if your point only makes sense due to leaving out important details, it’s not a good point. He wasn’t shot because “someone played loud noises in his face”.

        • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          30 seconds is a long time for someone to be harassing you. I can see why it escalated.

          But it still doesn’t justify deadly force. That’s a last resort.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          He also did not warn the person.

          Say: “Stop or I’ll shoot.”

          If the person keeps coming at you after you say that, you can infer their intent to do serious harm.

          Have to have a fact to hang your hat on, or you end up charged, and need to get massively lucky, like this dude, to avoid prison.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s dangerous, it’s not an imminent danger to life and limb.

        If you’re about to catch a beating, you can’t just shoot.

        The police, prosecution, judge, and half the jury, and me, think this conduct exceeded any right of self defense the dude had.

        No question he could.lawfully have maced him or punched him and there’d have been no charge. But to try and kill the guy?

        The jury apparently fucked it up by rendering an inconsistent verdict on the sole conviction. It’s dangerous when the jury says it’s deadlocked. It generally means someone in the room isn’t being reasonable, or is not following the judge’s instructions. And it resulted with inconsistent verdicts.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. Your country has a shit reputation because of the gun cult, the shootings, the constant war mongering, the blatant racism and homophobia, and the Christian lobby that fuels all of the above.

        Being the world’s economic leader doesn’t mean your internal policies can’t be shit, grow up.

        When Trump was visiting foreign countries, they literally flew giant ballons mocking him lmao.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lol Trump is not president anymore. Guess why.

          Plus my point still stands.

          You said “anyone” thinks America is fucking nuts. And yet people are willing to immigrate illegally. Do they think America is fucking nuts too?