• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Would it really be (serious question, as I dont know a whole lot about legal matters)? My limited understanding was that perjury is lying under oath, and sarcasm, while it does involve saying untrue statements, isnt considered lying in everyday speech because what it actually communicates is the opposite of the literal meaning of the words. Since laws deal with humans and not computers, my assumption would be that it probably works in such a way as to depend on what message a person is actually communicating rather than the precise syntax by which they communicate it?

      • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Sarcasm does not fly in court. Everything you say can and will be used against you. You do not have to be the defendant for that to apply. I sat through a lot of civil cases. Most of the people who lost, lost because they were being sarcastic. Sometimes, their LAWYER would take up this attitude, but judges are people, and they DO NOT like attitude. I was specifically a witness and sat through a lot of cases. This hit home for me.

        • FelixCress@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Most of the people who lost, lost because they were being sarcastic.

          What a complete and utter rubbish.

            • FelixCress@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              You made a general statement that MOST of people lost their cases just because they were sarcastic. This is utter tosh.

              Judges may not like sarcasm, no argument here. But to say that most people lost due to sarcasm is a complete nonsense.