Get fucked, Bezos.

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    4 months ago

    It would hurt this sociopath Bezos a lot more if people also canceled Amazon services en mass

  • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Post could lose all its subscribers and Bezos could still easily cover costs. He isn’t in the newspaper business for the money. He bought it for exactly moments like these. 8% is how much he just paid to hedge his bets

      • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah I was being hyperbolic for effect, but the point is that he owns the WaPo so that he can use it for his own personal social and political gain, not to make money off of it. I doubt the WaPo readership will substantially drop from this. And I have many questions about the people who still read his rag

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is a huge number too. Apparently the NYT leadership was crowing about gaining 4000 subscriptions over a few months recently.

      If gaining 4000 is considered a lot in the industry, losing 200,000 and growing is a roaring statement of disapproval.

  • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Serious question, but what stops the editors and writers who feel differently from just telling him no and printing what they want?

    I understand he owns them and could fire them, but I think that would be more telling and a much bigger story internationally if he just fired or shut down WaPo for not doing his bidding rather than this subscriber loss being what we see. Journalists used to do real reporting and expose huge things (some still do), so if they actually feel this way about the candidate then they should’ve just printed what they wanted anyway.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not much considering that’s what the entire editorial staff did anyway.

      But they don’t get to control the headline at the top of the front page.

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        As I’m not in journalism, why couldn’t the most senior editor control the top headline and push out the views of the also believe the same?

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Who tf was subscribed to that rag and was somehow not aware it was Bezos’ propaganda factory? Or were they aware of it and just now decided to draw the line?

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    The paradox: if, instead, 200,000 newcomers were to subscribe, the WaPo might be economically viable and then it could fire its owner.

    The WaPo is currently losing tens of millions of USD a year. That is not so much its fault as our fault. We are the ones who prefer to pay for Netflix and Amazon Prime than for quality journalism.