The IRB rejects your experiment for not being unethical enough.
The peer reviews are downright diabolical
“We enjoyed the discussion in which the author disseminated the fallout from vanquishing their foes, but we found their choice of method (‘Block out the Sun’) derivative of prior work ('Burns et al, 2005’) without citation.”
Burns et al 😂
Holy shit, Janet, the fuck you think minions, underlings, and henchmen are for? What, did you just wake up this morning and decided on a fucking whim that “like, idunno, I’m thinking my mood’s giving… like… (toe twirl) idunno… evilly scientisty! Yeah! Let’s give that shot!”
Fucking get your shit together, Janet. FFS
You know how expensive minions, underlings, and henchmen are?! Why do you think their performance is scrutinized so heavily? MUH is the largest share of the evil budget! You need at least 3 evil breakthroughs before you can expand your MUH budget!
I don’t know why Janet thought that the working conditions would be nice at the evil laboratory. It’s not exactly evil to take good care of your employees now, is it?
being evil doesnt mean being luddite. get a computer
Simply build a Paperwork Organiz-inator
Funny meme, but I don’t like how much popular media popularizes the archetype of the evil scientists so much. Scientists are like the least evil people
That’s why they’re evil/mad scientists, and not regular scientists.
